126 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 48clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 126 · Page 1 of 7
u/s 271(1)(c) initiated separately’. 3. The assessee contested the said proceedings by contending that on the date of levy of penalty, the assessee ceased to exist inasmuch as the same was merged with the UB Holdings Ltd., vide Karnataka High Court order dated 31.08.2005. It was contended that the notice issued in proceedings is invalid. On merits