BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

105 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,299Delhi845Ahmedabad379Jaipur289Chennai269Pune220Kolkata162Bangalore144Surat144Rajkot119Karnataka105Chandigarh102Indore101Hyderabad75Raipur65Amritsar53Visakhapatnam47Lucknow45Calcutta35Agra31Nagpur27Allahabad25Cuttack23Patna20Dehradun14Guwahati13Cochin11Jabalpur9Jodhpur8Ranchi7Varanasi4SC3Telangana2

Key Topics

Section 153C4Section 1444Section 44TDS4Section 260A2Section 1322Section 143(3)2Section 153D2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. GALI JANARDHANA REDDY

ITA/704/2018HC Karnataka31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and 271F were initiated. 10.It is observed in paragraph 5.4 of the order dated 31.03.2013 that in the previous years, the assessee has opted to club the income of minor children with her income, as the TDS 11 deducted from the Banks are in the name of assessee. Therefore, the income of minor

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. G. LAKSHMI ARUNA

Showing 1–20 of 105 · Page 1 of 6

ITA/705/2018HC Karnataka31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and 271F were initiated. 12 12. It is observed in paragraph 5.4 of the order dated 31.03.2013, that in the previous years, the assessee has opted to club the income of minor children with her income, as the TDS deducted from the Banks are in the name of assessee. Therefore, the income

M/S PROCESS PUMPS vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2650/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION 6350/2015 DATED 20/08/2015. THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT As in all appeals, common Judgment and the order of the learned Single Judge

M/S CATHODIC CONTROL CO. LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2648/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION 6350/2015 DATED 20/08/2015. THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT As in all appeals, common Judgment and the order of the learned Single Judge

SYNDICATE BANK vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2652/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION 6350/2015 DATED 20/08/2015. THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT As in all appeals, common Judgment and the order of the learned Single Judge

SRI.FATHERAJ SINGHVI, vs. UNION OF INDIA

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

WA/2663/2015HC Karnataka26 Aug 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 4

U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION 6350/2015 DATED 20/08/2015. THESE APPEALS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT As in all appeals, common Judgment and the order of the learned Single Judge

RAJAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/50955/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

B YUVARAJ vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/56988/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

R NAGARATHNA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8187/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI B S PATIL vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23435/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

MR C V MANJUNATHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/235/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

P. D. PONNAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12975/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

RAMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27625/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI SANTOSH A SHETTY vs. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA

WP/29668/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

BORALINGAIAH vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/33339/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

S B JAGADEESH vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/51160/2017HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SMT. V.KRISHNAMMA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36324/2017HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI SANJAY JAYARAM vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15270/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI. GURUPRASAD vs. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/8176/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

MR JAI KISHAN VIRWANI vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/34675/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS