SHRI. MUNINAGA REDDY vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX CIRCLE 6 (1)

Appeals are allowed to the aforesaid extent

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,JAYANT PATEL

u/s. 8 271(1)(c) of the Act observing at para 6 thereof that, “6. We are constrained to reject the assessee’s contention. We are pained to note that the Tribunal completely ignored the assessment order which was not based on any concession from the assessee. Concealment of income in the return filed by the assessee is a glaring

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BPL SANYO FINANCE LTD

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is

Bench: The Tribunal Was Arising From The Order Dated 4Th June 2004 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Bangalore (For Short “The

JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORAL JUDGMENT: (DILIP B BHOSALE, J) This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) is directed against the order dated 28th October 2005 rendered by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench “A” (for short “Tribunal”) in ITA 2171/Bng/2004

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MAKINO ASIA PVT LTD

Bench: B.MANOHAR,DILIP B.BHOSALE

JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORAL JUDGMENT: (DILIP B. BHOSALE J.) This appeal, under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order dated 15.09.2006 rendered by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in ITA No.3026/Bang/2004. By this order

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MWP LTD

Bench: N.KUMAR,RATHNAKALA

JUSTICE RATHNAKALA ITA No. 332 of 2007 In ITA No.332 of 2007 BETWEEN: 1. The Commissioner of Income Tax C.R. Building Queens Road Bangalore 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle – 2(3) C.R. Building Queens Road Bangalore …Appellants (By Sri K.V. Aravind & Sri B. Pramod, Advocates) AND: M/s. MWP Ltd., (since amalgamated with United Breweries Holdings

SRI.P.M.ABDULLA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: The Commissioner

u/s 271 (1) (c) of the Act against which the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner - 3 - of Income Tax (Appeals), Mangaluru. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal confirming the order of penalty. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal which came to be dismissed by the order dated 17.10.2016. Hence, this

RAHIM SAIB HIRIYUR HYDER ALI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

In the result, I pass the following:

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the AY 2010-11 herein marked as Annexure- A4. e. Issue a writ of mandamus or a direction in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to follow the direction of the Tribunal and pass the assessment order for the impugned assessment year

SHRI. RAMDAS T. VERNEKAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, I pass the following order

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar

penalty u/S 271(1)(c) has been initiated against the petitioner. Aggrieved by the impugned order at Annexure-A passed by the respondent No.1, petitioner preferred a revision petition before the respondent No.2-Revisioinal Authority which was also dismissed vide impugned order at Annexure-H dated 07.03.2017. 4. In addition to other contentions urged by the petitioner in the present petition

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. M/S CANARA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO.,

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

JUSTICE B MANOHAR Income Tax Appeal 382 / 2009 Between 1 Commissioner of Income Tax 55/1, Shilpashree Vidyaranya Complex Vishveshwaranagar Mysore 570 008 2 Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Range 2, # 59 HMT Bhavan, 6th Floor Bellary Road, Ganganagar Bangalore 32 Appellants (By Sri K V Aravind, Adv.) And M/s Canara Housing Development Company 10/1, Lakshminarayana Complex Palace Road, Bangalore

M/S. KANAKADAS PATTIN SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Accordingly, writ petition is allowed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Ashok S. Kinagi

JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI W.P. NO.146189/2020(I-IT) BETWEEN M/S. KANAKADAS PATTIN SAHAKARI SANGH NIYAMIT OPP: TAHASILDAR OFFICE, POST: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALAKOTE, R/BY ITS MANAGER, SHRI.PRASHANTH S/O NAGUSHA SINGRI, AGED: ABOUT 33 YEARS. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. H R KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE AND SMT. PATRI SHASHIKALA, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1, C.R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOTE, 2. THE COMMISSIONER

R G SRINIVASA MURTHY vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice H.N. Nagamohan Das W.P.No.4926/2013(T-It)

JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS W.P.NO.4926/2013(T-IT) BETWEEN: R.G.Srinivasa Murthy, S/o Gopalakrishna Shetty, Aged about 51 years, Residing at No.242/A, 4th Ward, 6th Main, N.R.Road, Davanagere 577 001. …. Petitioner (By Sri.R.Rama Murthy, Advocate) AND: 1. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Davanagere Range, Davanagere - 577 001. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Park View Building, P.J.Extension, Davanagere

SMT R S HAMALATHA vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice H.N. Nagamohan Das W.P.No.4927/2013(T-It)

JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS W.P.NO.4927/2013(T-IT) BETWEEN: Smt.R.S.Hemalatha, W/o R.G.Srinivasa Murthy, Aged about 47 years, Residing at No.242/A, 4th Ward, 6th Main, N.R.Road, Davanagere 577 001. …. Petitioner (By Sri.R.Rama Murthy, Advocate) AND: 1. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Davanagere Range, Davanagere - 577 001. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Park View Building, P.J.Extension, Davanagere

SMT R S HEMALATHA vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice H.N. Nagamohan Das W.P.No.4928/2013(T-It)

JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS W.P.NO.4928/2013(T-IT) BETWEEN: Smt.R.S.Hemalatha, W/o R.G.Srinivasa Murthy, Aged about 47 years, Residing at No.242/A, 4th Ward, 6th Main, N.R.Road, Davanagere 577 001. …. Petitioner (By Sri.R.Rama Murthy, Advocate) AND: 1. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Davanagere Range, Davanagere - 577 001. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Park View Building, P.J.Extension, Davanagere

R G SRINIVASA MURTHY vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice H.N. Nagamohan Das W.P.No.4925/2013 (T It)

JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS W.P.NO.4925/2013 (T IT) BETWEEN: R.G.Srinivasa Murthy, S/o Gopalakrishna Shetty, Aged about 51 years, Residing at No.242/A, 4th Ward, 6th Main, N.R.Road, Davanagere – 577 001. …. Petitioner (By Sri.R.Ram Murthy, Advocate) AND: 1. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Davanagere Range, Davanagere – 577 001. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Park View Building, P.J.Extension, Davanagere

R S PUNITH vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice H.N. Nagamohan Das W.P.No.4930/2013(T-It)

JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS W.P.NO.4930/2013(T-IT) BETWEEN: R.S.Punith, S/o R.G.Srinivasa Murthy, Aged about 25 years, Residing at No.242/A, 4th Ward, 6th Main, N.R.Road, Davanagere - 577 002. …. Petitioner (By Sri.R.Rama Murthy, Advocate) AND: 1. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Davanagere Range, Davanagere - 577 002. 2. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2, Park View Building, P.J.Extension, Davanagere

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

U/S 200[3] OF PROVISO TO SUB SECTION [3] OF SECTION 206C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, VIDE ANNEXURES-A1 TO A3. W.P.NOs.16939-16950/2014: BETWEEN: 1. M/s.TEACHERS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NITHYANANDA COMPLEX, MAIN ROAD, MOODBIDRI-574 227, (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 26 MRS.S.USHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, D/O SRI.A.P.NATH) 2. SRI SAMPATHRATHNA RAO S S/O.SUNDAR

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

U/S 200[3] OF PROVISO TO SUB SECTION [3] OF SECTION 206C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, VIDE ANNEXURES-A1 TO A3. W.P.NOs.16939-16950/2014: BETWEEN: 1. M/s.TEACHERS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NITHYANANDA COMPLEX, MAIN ROAD, MOODBIDRI-574 227, (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 26 MRS.S.USHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, D/O SRI.A.P.NATH) 2. SRI SAMPATHRATHNA RAO S S/O.SUNDAR

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

U/S 200[3] OF PROVISO TO SUB SECTION [3] OF SECTION 206C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, VIDE ANNEXURES-A1 TO A3. W.P.NOs.16939-16950/2014: BETWEEN: 1. M/s.TEACHERS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NITHYANANDA COMPLEX, MAIN ROAD, MOODBIDRI-574 227, (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 26 MRS.S.USHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, D/O SRI.A.P.NATH) 2. SRI SAMPATHRATHNA RAO S S/O.SUNDAR

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

U/S 200[3] OF PROVISO TO SUB SECTION [3] OF SECTION 206C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, VIDE ANNEXURES-A1 TO A3. W.P.NOs.16939-16950/2014: BETWEEN: 1. M/s.TEACHERS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NITHYANANDA COMPLEX, MAIN ROAD, MOODBIDRI-574 227, (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 26 MRS.S.USHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, D/O SRI.A.P.NATH) 2. SRI SAMPATHRATHNA RAO S S/O.SUNDAR