BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

103 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,090Delhi1,027Ahmedabad349Bangalore270Jaipur202Chennai164Pune160Hyderabad142Kolkata134Indore107Chandigarh105Karnataka103Surat90Raipur80Rajkot60Nagpur53Lucknow43Amritsar41Cochin40Calcutta35Visakhapatnam23Guwahati21Jodhpur13Allahabad13Dehradun12Patna11Agra10Ranchi9Cuttack7Varanasi6SC6Telangana3Jabalpur2Rajasthan2Panaji2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 260A4Section 153C4Section 1444Section 2604Section 2694Section 1322Section 143(3)2Section 153D2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GULBARGA vs. M/S MANJUNATHA COTTON AND GINNING FACTORY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/2564/2005HC Karnataka13 Dec 2012

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,N.KUMAR

Section 260Section 260A

exemptions claimed by the assessee in his return. The word ‘conceal’ involves a knowledge on the part of the assessee of the real income when giving the particulars. Concealment might arise even if the statement as to the income is a guarded one, as, for example, the enquiry should be made to ascertain the correct income. Concealment of income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. M/S CANARA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO.,

ITA/382/2009HC Karnataka18 Aug 2015

Bench: B.MANOHAR,VINEET SARAN

Section 269

Showing 1–20 of 103 · Page 1 of 6

Section 271

u/s 27I E of IT Act. It may be mentioned that in banking parlance ‘current account’ is treated as loan and the account holder is treated as a borrower which is opened only by obtaining some collateral security of stock/FDs. It is unlike saving bank of fixed deposits where the bank acts as a Borrower. (v) The transactions between

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT. G. LAKSHMI ARUNA

ITA/705/2018HC Karnataka31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and 271F were initiated. 12 12. It is observed in paragraph 5.4 of the order dated 31.03.2013, that in the previous years, the assessee has opted to club the income of minor children with her income, as the TDS deducted from the Banks are in the name of assessee. Therefore, the income

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. GALI JANARDHANA REDDY

ITA/704/2018HC Karnataka31 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 153CSection 153DSection 260A

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) and 271F were initiated. 10.It is observed in paragraph 5.4 of the order dated 31.03.2013 that in the previous years, the assessee has opted to club the income of minor children with her income, as the TDS 11 deducted from the Banks are in the name of assessee. Therefore, the income of minor

SRI SANTOSH A SHETTY vs. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA

WP/29668/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

RAMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27625/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

RAJAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/50955/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI. GURUPRASAD vs. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/8176/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI S BAGHIRATHA vs. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/22935/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

MR C V MANJUNATHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/235/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI B S PATIL vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23435/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SMT. V.KRISHNAMMA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36324/2017HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

S B JAGADEESH vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/51160/2017HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

BORALINGAIAH vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/33339/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SRI SANJAY JAYARAM vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15270/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

P. D. PONNAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12975/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

B YUVARAJ vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/56988/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

R NAGARATHNA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8187/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

MR JAI KISHAN VIRWANI vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/34675/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

JAGADISHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/28421/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

U/S 9 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT 2011, PRODUCED AND MARKED ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 23515/2019: BETWEEN: 1 . SMT BHAGYAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA 256 BENGALURU-560 040. 2 . SRI.D.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 3 . SRI.D.HANUMANTHAIAH S/O LATE C.K.DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS