BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi837Mumbai746Chennai274Jaipur265Bangalore240Surat187Hyderabad129Chandigarh104Kolkata99Cochin86Ahmedabad81Pune69Indore60Nagpur55Rajkot51Visakhapatnam42Amritsar35Calcutta34Guwahati28Agra25Lucknow22Raipur21Cuttack11Patna11Allahabad10Varanasi8Jodhpur7Karnataka4Telangana4SC2Dehradun2Jabalpur1Ranchi1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 2605Section 695Section 683Unexplained Investment3Addition to Income3Section 44A2Section 143(2)2Section 153A2Section 254

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/512/2017HC Karnataka23 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 2(22)(e)Section 254Section 260

credits as the undisclosed income in the hands of the Assessee under Section 68 of the Act and the learned Tribunal on an appeal though held that the additions in the hands of the Assessee under Section 68 of the Act could not be sustained but, the Tribunal proceeded to add the aforesaid amounts as unexplained income of the Assessee

SHRI HARISH WADHWA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,

Appeal is allowed

ITA/224/2020HC Karnataka27 Jan 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

2
Section 2(22)(e)2
Section 142(1)
Section 143(2)
Section 143(3)
Section 144
Section 260
Section 44A
Section 68
Section 69
Section 69C

cash deposits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (iv) Whether the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the addition of Rs.28,71,972/- (credit card expenses) towards unexplained expenditure under Section 69C of the Act, without considering that the assessee had declared income under the provisions of Section 44AD of the Act? (v) Whether the Tribunal

SRI S S JYOTHI PRAKASH vs. THE ADDL COMMISSIONER

The appeal is allowed accordingly

ITA/460/2010HC Karnataka07 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260Section 68Section 69

unexplained investment in a residential house at Shimoga. The addition was made with regard to purchase of residential house for a consideration of Rs.66,56,142/- which included the stamp duty payment. The value of the property by the Assessing Officer was taken at Rs.90,51,000/- as against actual consideration reflected in the sale deed at Rs.60

TEKTRONIX (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

In the result, the appeal

COP/61/2015HC Karnataka10 Jul 2015

Bench: SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 139Section 142(2)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 260Section 260ASection 263

Housing Development Corporation which is a partnership firm. A search and seizure operation was conducted in the case of the assessee on 06.01.2009 and 4 during the course of search, lot of incriminating materials were seized by the Department. The case of the assessee was centralized vide order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax dated 16.04.2009 and a notice