BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai217Delhi201Bangalore165Kolkata69Chennai25Ahmedabad19Jaipur16Hyderabad12Surat6Pune5Karnataka3Indore3SC2Kerala1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 2603Section 10A2Section 2542Section 2(22)(e)2Comparables/TP2

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/512/2017HC Karnataka23 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 2(22)(e)Section 254Section 260

TP)A No.461/Bang/2016 (Annexure F), to the extent questioned herein; in the interest of justice & equity etc. This I.T.A. having been heard and reserved on 12-07-2018, coming on for Pronouncement of Judgment, this day, Dr Vineet Kothari, J, delivered the following: J U D G M E N T Mr. Percy Pardiwala. Sr. Counsel a/w Mrs. Tanmayee Rajkumar

PR.COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S TEXTRON INDIA

ITA/544/2016HC Karnataka31 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 10A
Section 260
Section 260A

method of re- computation is provided under the Act? 4. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, that the Tribunal was Date of Judgment 31-07-2018 I.T.A.No.544/2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 & Anr. Vs. M/s. Textron India Private Limited. 4/15 right in holding that 15% is to be considered for RPT filter instead

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. WITTNESS SYSTEM

ITA/347/2013HC Karnataka11 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 10ASection 260

TP study has taken companies having turnover of more than Rs.200 crores as comparables. In these circumstances, it was submitted by him that the assessee cannot have any grievance in this regard. 17. We have considered the rival submissions. The provisions of the Act and the Rules that are relevant for deciding the issue have to be first seen. Sec.92