BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 40A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai348Delhi291Bangalore112Chennai88Jaipur56Ahmedabad39Hyderabad38Kolkata37Raipur27Chandigarh19Pune17Nagpur12Amritsar12Rajkot11Indore11Lucknow10Cuttack10Patna8Surat6Visakhapatnam4Karnataka4SC1Cochin1Varanasi1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 26011Section 153A2

ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

WA/200056/2021HC Karnataka22 Dec 2022

Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR,K S HEMALEKHA

Section 4

40a) SEETABAI W/O UMALA AGED MAJOR 40b) GOPAL S/O UMALA AGED MAJOR, SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES - 43 - 40b.i) SONI BAI W/O UMALA PAWAR AGED 65 YRS, R/O MALKHED STATION THANDA, MALKHED ROAD, SEDAM TALUK 585292 40c) NARASINGH S/O UMALA AGED MAJOR, ALL ARE RESIDING AT STATION TANDA, MALKHED ROAD, SEDAM TALUK, KALABURAGI DISTRICT. 41. SURESH S/O SOMLA SINCE DECEASED

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

40a(ii) of the Act. He also contended that the arguments which were canvassed - 39 - before this Court were not canvassed before the lower authorities and therefore, they had no opportunity to consider the same and therefore on that score those orders cannot be found fault with. As the matter has already been remanded

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

40a(ii) of the Act. He also contended that the arguments which were canvassed - 39 - before this Court were not canvassed before the lower authorities and therefore, they had no opportunity to consider the same and therefore on that score those orders cannot be found fault with. As the matter has already been remanded

TEKTRONIX (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

In the result, the appeal

COP/61/2015HC Karnataka10 Jul 2015

Bench: SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 139Section 142(2)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 260Section 260ASection 263

Housing Development Corporation which is a partnership firm. A search and seizure operation was conducted in the case of the assessee on 06.01.2009 and 4 during the course of search, lot of incriminating materials were seized by the Department. The case of the assessee was centralized vide order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax dated 16.04.2009 and a notice