BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

435 results for “house property”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka435Mumbai233Delhi218Hyderabad65Jaipur51Bangalore46Chennai45Indore31Ahmedabad27Cuttack23Cochin21Kolkata19Calcutta17Chandigarh16Visakhapatnam13Pune7Surat5Guwahati5Lucknow4Telangana4Dehradun4Rajasthan4Agra3Amritsar2Nagpur2SC1Andhra Pradesh1Jodhpur1Varanasi1Gauhati1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Addition to Income47Section 26012Section 12A5Section 174Section 80G2

K SEEVAN vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (EAST)

WP/33871/2011HC Karnataka23 Nov 2012

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S.Abdul Nazeer Writ Petition Nos.33871/2011 & 37249/2011 (Lb-Bmp) Between : 1 K Seevan S/O Sathi Pani Aged About 44 Yars R/At No.1128, 14Th Cross Indiranagara 2Nd Stage Bangalore-38

Section 269

house) in favour of Sundara Murthy, son of V.Shanmuga Mudaliar for a sum of Rs.25,000/-. Sundara Murthy filed a suit for recovery of the mortgaged amount and obtained a decree. This decree was executed in Execution Case Nos.106 and 107 of 1949-50. On 20.3.1952, a Court Commissioner and Advocate-Smt.Sharada put up the property for auction. The property bearing

THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF vs. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

CA/71/2018HC Karnataka16 Dec 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 151

property of the Company and that the mark cannot therefore be sold by the - 35 - Company. It was claimed as has been stated in the application filed by Mr. Irani for impleadment that the mark “Yezdi” belongs to the family and accordingly, only Mr. Irani can have a right over the mark. • It was also contended that no person after

Showing 1–20 of 435 · Page 1 of 22

...

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LTD

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

ITA/54/2013HC Karnataka22 Sept 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 260Section 260ASection 80I

PROPERTIES’, (2013) 353 ITR 36 (BOMBAY), (2008) 119 TTJ 269 (BANGALORE), ITA 412/BANG/09, ITA 763/2009 C/W 25/2009, ITA 1355/BANG/2010, ITA 61/2012, SLP AGAINST 25/2009 IN CC 2309/2013, SLP AGAINST 763/2009 IN CC 20865/2012, SLP AGAINST 61/2012 IN CC 9188/2013, R.P.WAS DISMISSED IN RP(C) NO.490 OF 2013, ‘ACIT VS. ‘G.R.DEVELOPERS IN ITA 405/BANG/2010, ‘CIT VS. M/S G.R. DEVELOPERS

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WTA/1/2019HC Karnataka04 Mar 2020

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 81

Section 33A of RP Act and 106 he has committed corrupt practice of bribery as contemplated under Sections 123(1)(A), 123(1)(B), 123(7), 123(7)(b), 123(vii)(d), 123(7)(h) and Section 123(8), 123(3), 3A and 123(6) of R.P. Act ? The petitioner in E.P. No.2/2019 has contended that respondent No.1 committed corrupt

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

Section 145A of the Income- tax Act which was inserted with effect from assessment year 1999-2000. The said provision states that the valuation of stock should include the amount of any tax duty, cess or fee - 94 - actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to its present location and condition. The Department has followed a consistent stand

SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O RUDRAPPA vs. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFICER

WP/114544/2015HC Karnataka07 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice B. Veerappa W.P. No.114544/2015 & 114650/2015 (Gm-Res) Between 1. Smt. Kamalamma W/O Rudragouda Aged About : 40 Years Occ:House Wife R/O: 3Rd Ward, No.64 Halekote Village Tq:Siraguppa Dist:Bellary-583121 2. Smt. H Kanyakumari W/O Late Nilakantagouda Age: 64 Years, Occ:Nil R/O:3Rd Ward, No.64 Halekote Village Tq:Siraguppa Dist:Bellary-583121 ... Petitioners (By Sri Gode Nagaraja, Advocate) & 1. The Panchayath Development Officer No.64 Halekote Village-583121

HOUSE WIFE R/O: 3RD WARD, NO.64 HALEKOTE VILLAGE TQ:SIRAGUPPA DIST:BELLARY-583121 2. SMT. H KANYAKUMARI W/O LATE NILAKANTAGOUDA AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC:NIL R/O:3RD WARD, NO.64 HALEKOTE VILLAGE TQ:SIRAGUPPA DIST:BELLARY-583121 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI GODE NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NO.64 HALEKOTE VILLAGE-583121 : 2 : SIRAGUPPA TALUK DIST:BELLARY 2. THE PRESIDENT

PR. COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S. EMBASSY CHARITABLE TRUST

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

ITA/458/2019HC Karnataka27 Jan 2022

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.G.S. KAMAL

Section 12ASection 260Section 80GSection 80G(5)(vi)

houses and hostels; XXX (8) The Trust property or any part thereof shall not be applied for any of the purposes mentioned in this Deed which are not or cease to be educational objects and purpose but only to such of the objects and purpose as may be educational objects or purposes in law and such other objects and purposes

NIRMALA BAGODI vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41506/2017HC Karnataka13 Dec 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

Section 17

property of the wife. He would contend that the impugned order passed on the grounds of morality or other grounds cannot be the grounds for disqualification and the disqualification must be relatable to a ground or basis enumerated in the statute. Elaborating further he would draw the attention of the court to the provision of Section 16 and would contend

SRI CHITURI DURGA RAO vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41507/2017HC Karnataka13 Dec 2017

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

Section 17

property of the wife. He would contend that the impugned order passed on the grounds of morality or other grounds cannot be the grounds for disqualification and the disqualification must be relatable to a ground or basis enumerated in the statute. Elaborating further he would draw the attention of the court to the provision of Section 16 and would contend

M/S. MEDA CONSTRUCTIONS vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/45817/2018HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

SRI KRISHANAMA RAJU vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/59/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

SRI C THIMMA REDDY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/34265/2018HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

M/S. UKN ESPERANZA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18873/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

M/S B & B INFRASTRUCTURE LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/11386/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

SMT. AMMAYYA @ AMMAYAMMA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/50442/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

SRI M MUNISWAMY vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30168/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/23888/2019HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

DR M RAVINDRA VARMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8540/2020HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD

SMT. H G SHEELA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12535/2016HC Karnataka04 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

HOUSE NO.1, VARS FERNDALE APARTMENTS 1ST MAIN, KODIHALLI HAL 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 008. 2. M/S SUBHODAYARAGA INFRA PVT LTD., A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.144, 12TH MAIN, 23RD CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. DR. KRISHNA T V REDDY AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T.V.CHALAMA REDDY R/AT NO.501, 6TH FLOOR, WINDSOR CASTLE NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD