MR.M.GEORGE JOSEPH vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOMET TAX OFFICER

In the result, order of the

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

house within three years from the date of transfer of original asset. It is also urged that case of the assessee was a case of construction of the property and not mere purchase. In support of aforesaid submission, reliance has been placed on Circulars dated 15.10.1986 and 16.12.1993 issued by Central Board of Directors. It is also urged that since

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 33A of RP Act and 106 he has committed corrupt practice of bribery as contemplated under Sections 123(1)(A), 123(1)(B), 123(7), 123(7)(b), 123(vii)(d), 123(7)(h) and Section 123(8), 123(3), 3A and 123(6) of R.P. Act ? The petitioner in E.P. No.2/2019 has contended that respondent No.1 committed corrupt

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

253 of the Act. 21. Section 254 of the Act delineates the powers of the Tribunal. We are not presently deciding the taxability part of such buy-back of the shares by the Company because that would essentially depend upon the fresh inquiry or investigation upon remand by the learned Tribunal vide impugned Order dated Date of Judgment

M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

253(4) of the Act? (2) If the answer to the above question is in the negative; Whether impugned order dated 15 31.01.2014 – Annexure-R passed by first respondent is liable to be interfered for any reason whatsoever? (3) What order? RE: POINT No.(1) 11. Learned Advocate appearing for respondents has raised a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

property, in pursuance of an illegal or immoral contract, to recover it back; for 'the Courts will not assist an illegal transaction in any respect'. The maxim is therefore, intimately connected with the more comprehensive rule of law, ex turpi causa non oritur actio, on account of which no Court will allow itself to be made the instrument of enforcing

OPTO CIRCUIT INDIA LTD vs. AXIS BANK

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

HOUSE OFFICER C.B.I./A.C.B/BANGALORE, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA STRESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT BRANCH, 2ND FLOOR, OFFICE COMPLEX BUILDING, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE COMPOUND, BENGALURU-560 004. R 2 REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, M. RAMAKRISHNA SHENOY AGED ABOUT MAJOR, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER. … RESPONDENTS

SRI CHITURI DURGA RAO vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

253. The Hon’ble Apex Court in a case arising out of the T.N. Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 examined the issue as to whether a foster son comes within the definition of family within the meaning of Section 2(6-A). Interpreting the clause, the Hon’ble Apex Court has been pleased to observe as follows

NIRMALA BAGODI vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice G. Narendar Writ Petition No.41506/2017 (Apmc) C/W Writ Petition No.41507/2017 (Apmc)

253. The Hon’ble Apex Court in a case arising out of the T.N. Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 examined the issue as to whether a foster son comes within the definition of family within the meaning of Section 2(6-A). Interpreting the clause, the Hon’ble Apex Court has been pleased to observe as follows

MASTER BALACHANDAR KRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 8 of the Act provides for the authorities of the School which are five in number. Section 18 of the Act which deals with authorities and Officers of the School etc., states that the authorities of the School and their composition, powers, functions and other matters relating to them, the officers of the School and their appointment, powers, functions

DR (MS) B K NAIK vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar

6. PROGRESSIVE EDUCATION TRUST, GULEDAGUDDA TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT, RPTD.BY ITS CHAIRMAN 7. THE PRINCIPAL S M BHANDARI ARTS, RR BHANDARI COMMERCE, & S K RATHI SCIENCE COLLEGE, GULEDAGUDDA, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.A.G. SHIVANNA, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL A/W SRI RAVI V.HOSAMANI, AGA FOR R1-R5 ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION

JAY PEE CEMENT CORPORATION LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS vs. THE GULBARGA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. LTD. ORS

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice E.S. Indiresh

Section 27- 85 A(1)(c) lies to this Court. Therefore, we have no hesitation in issuing a direction of caution that it will not be a proper exercise of jurisdiction by the High Courts to entertain writ petitions against such orders of the Commission." 33. Another Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax and others

H.G.RANGANGOUD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHARJEE (AG.CJ)

HOUSE NO.1217/24, BEHIND GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, HOSPET TOWN, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) -: 106 :- AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE

M/S GARUDADHRI IMPEX PVT. LTD.,., vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHARJEE (AG.CJ)

HOUSE NO.1217/24, BEHIND GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, HOSPET TOWN, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) -: 106 :- AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE

BELLARY MINING CORPORATION LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHARJEE (AG.CJ)

HOUSE NO.1217/24, BEHIND GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, HOSPET TOWN, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) -: 106 :- AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE

M/S B ASHWATHNARAYANA SINGH & CO vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHARJEE (AG.CJ)

HOUSE NO.1217/24, BEHIND GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, HOSPET TOWN, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) -: 106 :- AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE

M/S ASSOCIATED MINING COMPANY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHARJEE (AG.CJ)

HOUSE NO.1217/24, BEHIND GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, HOSPET TOWN, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) -: 106 :- AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE

M/S.V S LAD & SONS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHARJEE (AG.CJ)

HOUSE NO.1217/24, BEHIND GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, HOSPET TOWN, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) -: 106 :- AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE

M/S KARIGANUR MINERAL MINING INDUSTRY vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHARJEE (AG.CJ)

HOUSE NO.1217/24, BEHIND GOVERNMENT QUARTERS, HOSPET TOWN, BELLARY DISTRICT-583 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI: L.M. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE) -: 106 :- AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVANA, 18TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE