SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B S YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

251 measuring 6 acres 18 guntas of Halagevaderahalli Village, Bangalore South Taluk, gave up from acquisition of land by conniving with the landlords and officials of other Department. In W.P.No.26396/2015 (Crime No.39/2015) pertaining to land in Sy.Nos.5/1 and 6/3 measuring 1 acre 17 guntas of Bilekahalli village, Bangalore South Taluk. The petitioner herein with a malafide intention

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. HOSAGRAHAR

Appeal stands dismissed

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

property outside India which cannot be said that assesse has satisfied the conditions set out in the said section?" I.T.A. NO.601 OF 2019 5 2. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances to the case, the order passed by the Tribunal can be said as perverse in nature since the Tribunal has relied upon amended provisions of section

COMMISSIONER OF vs. MR VINAY MISHRA

In the result, the appeal fails and the same is

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

house in India in order to claim exemption under Section 54F(1) of the Act has been incorporated w.e.f. 01.04.2015. 7. Before proceeding further, we may advert to certain well settled legal principles. The Supreme Court in ‘GOVIND DAS vs. I.T.O’, (1976) 1 SCC 906 held that unless the terms of a statute expressly so provide or necessarily require

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD

In the result, the appeals stand dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Section 10(35) of the Act. Apart from this, the assessee also claimed short-term loss of Rs.5,02,05,005/- arising out of redemption of units with mutual fund. However, a revised return was filed showing nil income sans claiming any loss from mutual funds. 5. The Assessing Officer rejecting the contention of the assessee brought the income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD

In the result, the appeals stand dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

Section 10(35) of the Act. Apart from this, the assessee also claimed short-term loss of Rs.5,02,05,005/- arising out of redemption of units with mutual fund. However, a revised return was filed showing nil income sans claiming any loss from mutual funds. 5. The Assessing Officer rejecting the contention of the assessee brought the income

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

house property” on the grounds mentioned in the question referred to us. Our answer to the question is, therefore, Date of Judgment :23-07-2018 I.T.A.No.512/2017 M/s. Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, & Anr. 65/86 in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The parties are left to bear

JAY PEE CEMENT CORPORATION LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS vs. THE GULBARGA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. LTD. ORS

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice E.S. Indiresh

251, 252, 257, 258, 259, 260, 260/1, 260/2, 262/3, 265/1, 265/2, 265/3, 266, 268/1, 271/2, 271/3, 272/2 and 298/2 pursuant to the sale certificate issued by the D.R.T. Kolkota which is subject matter of application dated 08.12.2012 vide Annexure-D1; and etc. 9 CASE OF THE WRIT PETITIONERS 5. Facts leading to filing of Writ Petitions are that, the petitioner

KAMALSAB S/O. DAWOODSAB SAVANUR vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar Writ Petition No. 79811 Of 2013(Lr) Between Sri. Kamalsab S/O. Dawoodsab Savanur Age: 51 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/O. Kotigeri Oni, Hangal, Dist:Haveri. ... Petitioner (By Sri. D L Ladkhan, Advocate) & 1. The State Of Karnataka R/By Secretary Department Of Revenue M.S. Building, Bengaluru 2. The Land Tribunal, Hangal R/By Its Secretary Tq:Hangal, Dist: Haveri 3. Sri. Ramachandra Hemajippa Sugandhi Since Deceased By His Lrs 3A. Smt. Sunanda W/O. Krishna Sugandhi Age: Major, Occ: Household Work R/O. Bazar Galli, Near Chavadi Hangal, Dist: Haveri

property. To have sat on the fence and allowed the Government to complete the, acquisition proceedings on the basis that the notification under s. 4 and the declaration under s. 6 were valid and then to attack the notification on grounds which were available to them at the time when the notification was published would be, putting a premium

SMT. M R PRABHAVATHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice K.Natarajan Election Petition No.1 Of 2019 Connected With Election Petition No.2 Of 2019

Section 33A of RP Act and 106 he has committed corrupt practice of bribery as contemplated under Sections 123(1)(A), 123(1)(B), 123(7), 123(7)(b), 123(vii)(d), 123(7)(h) and Section 123(8), 123(3), 3A and 123(6) of R.P. Act ? The petitioner in E.P. No.2/2019 has contended that respondent No.1 committed corrupt