BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh65Mumbai56Delhi25Chennai19Hyderabad17Bangalore12Kolkata10Visakhapatnam9Amritsar7Karnataka5Pune3Jaipur3Cochin3SC3Raipur3Ahmedabad2Telangana2Nagpur1J&K1Lucknow1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 2603

BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals are allowed in part

ITA/673/2016HC Karnataka28 Sept 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 12ASection 194JSection 260Section 260A

properties acquired through KIADB for right of way for Bangalore Metro Rail project is subject to quantum of service charges payable to KIADB. The balances are under reconciliation with KIADB. Thus, it was argued that the Assessing Officer has failed to appreciate this portion of the note “subject to quantum of service charges payable to KIADB” and has arrived

M/S POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED vs. MR SWAMY GOWDA

WP/27668/2015HC Karnataka
07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

HOUSING BOARD, HUBLI AND ANOTHER reported in 2010(1) KCCR 543 (DB) whereunder, it came to be held that 10 interest would be payable from the date of possession of the respective lands being taken and not from the date of preliminary notification by relying upon Hon’ble Apex Court judgment. 5. In order to enjoy the fruits

M/S. POWER GRID CORPORATION vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/43215/2015HC Karnataka07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

HOUSING BOARD, HUBLI AND ANOTHER reported in 2010(1) KCCR 543 (DB) whereunder, it came to be held that 10 interest would be payable from the date of possession of the respective lands being taken and not from the date of preliminary notification by relying upon Hon’ble Apex Court judgment. 5. In order to enjoy the fruits

M/S POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED vs. MR. B.B. MADAYA

WP/26380/2015HC Karnataka07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

HOUSING BOARD, HUBLI AND ANOTHER reported in 2010(1) KCCR 543 (DB) whereunder, it came to be held that 10 interest would be payable from the date of possession of the respective lands being taken and not from the date of preliminary notification by relying upon Hon’ble Apex Court judgment. 5. In order to enjoy the fruits

M/S POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/27667/2015HC Karnataka07 Mar 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

HOUSING BOARD, HUBLI AND ANOTHER reported in 2010(1) KCCR 543 (DB) whereunder, it came to be held that 10 interest would be payable from the date of possession of the respective lands being taken and not from the date of preliminary notification by relying upon Hon’ble Apex Court judgment. 5. In order to enjoy the fruits