BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ Section 120Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi16Telangana7Karnataka6Calcutta2Mumbai1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 349Section 4575Section 3924Section 4823Addition to Income3Section 374(2)2Section 3022Section 120B2Section 13(1)(d)2

CONVERGYTICS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6811/2022HC Karnataka30 Sept 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M. Nagaprasanna

Section 482

Housing Society Ltd. v. Union of India, 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 974 : 2012 Cri LJ 520] , the Division Bench of the Bombay High 30 Court once again considered the issue and rejected the argument that prior notice to the account-holder was required to be given before seizure of his bank account. It also noted that the bank account need

M/S CANFIN HOMES LIMITED vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

The appeals are disposed off accordingly

ITA/1126/2006HC Karnataka26 Sept 2012

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Ravi Malimath & The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice K.Somashekar Criminal Appeal No.1126 Of 2006 Connected With Criminal Appeal No.1167 Of 2006 In Criminal Appeal No.1126 Of 2006: Between 1. Praveen Murthy, S/O. Shubha Murthy, Aged 35 Years, Christian, Patanjak Nursing Home, Working As Lab Technician, R/O. Venkataramana Badavane, Chitradurga. 2. Pankaja @ Pinki, W/O. Praveen Murthy, Aged 39 Years, Working As Receptionist, In Naveen Rigency Hotel, R/At Venkataramana Badavane, Chitradurga. ... Appellants (By Sri. M. J. Peerjade, Adv.) & The State Of Karnataka

Section 302Section 34Section 374(2)Section 392Section 457

property belong to them. 10. As from the evidence of P.W.2, it is clear that articles were stolen from the house of the deceased. P.W.3 the maid servant who had first seen the dead body lying in the house in the morning of 19.04.2005. She had also identified the articles that were found in the house i.e., two pieces

OPTO CIRCUIT INDIA LTD vs. AXIS BANK

WP/8031/2020HC Karnataka13 Aug 2020

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

Section 120BSection 13(1)(d)Section 13(2)Section 482

HOUSE OFFICER C.B.I./A.C.B/BANGALORE, ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH, NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA STRESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT BRANCH, 2ND FLOOR, OFFICE COMPLEX BUILDING, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE COMPOUND, BENGALURU-560 004. R 2 REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, M. RAMAKRISHNA SHENOY AGED ABOUT MAJOR, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER. … RESPONDENTS

M B RUDRAMUNI vs. THE STATE BY HULIMAVU POLICE STATION

WP/57102/2016HC Karnataka16 Jul 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs. Justice K.S.Mudagal

Section 156(3)Section 482

property. 9. Based on that complaint, respondent No.1 police registered first information report Annexure – E in Crime No.624/2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 406, 471, 468, 419 and 420 of IPC. In that first information report, the petitioners were arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2, Muralidhar, the Senior Sub-Registrar and the Managing Director of Nandi Housing

SMT M MANJULA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4333/2021HC Karnataka28 Apr 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar Writ Petition No.4333 Of 2021 (Gm-Police) Between :

house of sixth respondent and found his father hanging. Raghunath was shifted to Vydehi Hospital for treatment and Doctors declared him as 'brought dead'. Though petitioners intended to lodge a complaint of murder, they were not allowed to do so. But, their case was registered as UDR No.28/2019 in HAL Police Station. 3. On 15.02.2020, first petitioner sought to lodge

KHALEEL AHMED K R vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27674/2012HC Karnataka21 Jun 2016

Bench: B.VEERAPPA,K.NATARAJAN

house inquiry was held by a Three Member Sub- Committee of the KPSC in regard to the alleged irregularities, and a report had been submitted to the effect that the results of the ten candidates were vitiated by malpractice and recommending the cancellation of their results after following the necessary procedures and further recommending certain other steps. It assured that