Search: house property | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

867 results for “house property”+ House Propertyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,500 Delhi5,077 Bangalore1,947 Chennai1,728 Kolkata1,016 Karnataka867 Hyderabad726 Jaipur679 Ahmedabad630 Pune560 Chandigarh397 Surat317 Indore255 Telangana240 Cochin233 Visakhapatnam166 Amritsar152 Rajkot144 Nagpur133 Raipur125 Lucknow117 SC88 Patna87 Cuttack84 Calcutta80 Agra78 Jodhpur50 Guwahati39 Dehradun32 Varanasi26 Rajasthan24 Jabalpur23 Kerala22 Allahabad20 Ranchi16 Panaji16 Orissa9 Punjab & Haryana6 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5 Gauhati2 Himachal Pradesh2 Andhra Pradesh2 J&K1 T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 ANIL R. DAVE L. NAGESWARA RAO1 ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 26066 Addition to Income22 Section 54F16 Exemption10 Deduction10 Section 260A9 Section 349 Section 80I8 House Property8 Section 11

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MR.SYED MOHAMMED SHABBIR

ITA/567/2015HC Karnataka31 May 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 143(3)Section 260

properties as ‘Income from House Property’ since Assessment Year 2003-04 onwards and the same has been

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

ITA/403/2009HC Karnataka28 Apr 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

property and had received rental income from the house property. Hence, expenses in that regard did not arise

Showing 1–20 of 867 · Page 1 of 44

...

7

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

ITA/402/2009HC Karnataka28 Apr 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

property and had received rental income from the house property. Hence, expenses in that regard did not arise

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT LTD

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

ITA/402/2014HC Karnataka28 Apr 2016

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

property and had received rental income from the house property. Hence, expenses in that regard did not arise

ANTONY PARAKAL KURIAN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed in part

ITA/254/2021HC Karnataka09 Dec 2021

Bench: S.SUJATHA,S RACHAIAH

Section 260Section 260ASection 54Section 54F

House property in favour of M/s. Fashion Jewellery for Rs.2.42 Crores vide sale deed registered on 08.10.2012. Capital

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41238/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41237/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41239/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41229/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41231/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41235/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41230/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41241/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B S YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/26395/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41240/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41232/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/41234/2015HC Karnataka05 Jan 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

Section 482Section 7

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right

SHRI. NAVIN JOLLY vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER

In the result, appeal is allowed

ITA/320/2011HC Karnataka18 Jun 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.NAGAPRASANNA

Section 143(2)Section 260Section 260ASection 54FSection 54F(1)

house’ includes not only self occupied properties but also let out properties. It was further held that

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. ANZ OPERATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,

ITA/357/2011HC Karnataka15 Jul 2020

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice N.K.Sudhindrarao R.F.A.No.1124/2011 C/W R.F.A.No.357/2011

Section 96Section 96(1)

property and item No.2 – residential house, the other properties are given goby, wherein when the particulars are given

M/S MAHESH INVESTMENTS vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/338/2012HC Karnataka03 Jul 2013

Bench: The Tribunal.

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 260

house property, as against the claim of the assessee that it should be assessed under the head ‘business