THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

property constructed by the assessee was let-out and rental income was received under the head ‘Income from House Property

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT LTD

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

property constructed by the assessee was let-out and rental income was received under the head ‘Income from House Property

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. IBC KNOWLEDGE PARK PVT. LTD.,

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,JAYANT PATEL

property constructed by the assessee was let-out and rental income was received under the head ‘Income from House Property

ANTONY PARAKAL KURIAN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed in part

Bench: S.SUJATHA,S RACHAIAH

house property so transferred; 21. This provision would not assist the Revenue to consider the assessee as the owner of the house

M LAXMANGOUD vs. M NARSANGOUD

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

properties i.e. landed and house properties situated at Matamari village. These defendants adoptive father had left entire landed house property

SMT H M BHAGYAMMA vs. SMT CHANDRAMMA (DEAD)

The appeal is allowed in part

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice H.P.Sandesh

house situated in item No.1 of the ‘A’ schedule property is a sheet house. She does not know about the house

PADMAVATHI vs. SMT. JAYAMMA

The appeal is allowed in part in the aforesaid terms

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

property]. iii. The family also undertook the construction of a residential house in Schedule-B property; iv. The old building

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B S YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts

SHRI B.S. YEDDYURAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mrs.Justice Rathnakala

House and is considered to be the property of the House. No other authority has any right to pick up extracts