BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Unexplained Moneyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,106Delhi1,735Chennai752Kolkata667Bangalore410Jaipur363Hyderabad327Ahmedabad325Chandigarh158Indore157Rajkot149Pune145Surat143Nagpur91Cochin91Raipur68Visakhapatnam67Lucknow59Amritsar57Guwahati48Allahabad44Calcutta38Cuttack38Agra37Panaji32Jodhpur32Patna27Dehradun18Varanasi10Ranchi9Karnataka7Telangana5Jabalpur3SC3Orissa2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Punjab & Haryana1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 26031Section 14810Section 139(1)5Section 1535Revision u/s 2635Section 2542Section 2(22)(e)2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA (HUF)

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5038/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

unexplained cash credits being the consideration for disallowing the assessee’s claim on its loss merely on - 31 - the ground that either the diamonds were not there or the assesee had ploughed back its unaccounted money

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA (HUF)

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5036/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

unexplained cash credits being the consideration for disallowing the assessee’s claim on its loss merely on - 31 - the ground that either the diamonds were not there or the assesee had ploughed back its unaccounted money

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA, M/S BELLARY STEEL ROLING MILLS,

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5035/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

unexplained cash credits being the consideration for disallowing the assessee’s claim on its loss merely on - 31 - the ground that either the diamonds were not there or the assesee had ploughed back its unaccounted money

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.MADHAVA, M/S BELLARY STEEL ROLING MILLS,

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5034/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

unexplained cash credits being the consideration for disallowing the assessee’s claim on its loss merely on - 31 - the ground that either the diamonds were not there or the assesee had ploughed back its unaccounted money

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. S.PARVATHI MADHAVA

The appeals are allowed

ITA/5037/2009HC Karnataka13 Aug 2012

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 153Section 260

unexplained cash credits being the consideration for disallowing the assessee’s claim on its loss merely on - 31 - the ground that either the diamonds were not there or the assesee had ploughed back its unaccounted money

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI. R. CHARUCHANDRA

Appeal is hereby dismissed

ITA/6001/2013HC Karnataka13 Feb 2017

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

Section 132Section 141Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 260A

disallowed certain claims made by the assessee or in other words, added the following: 4 “Add: (i) Undisclosed investment in Money lending as discussed in Para 4 above. - ` 35,50,00 (ii) Unexplained

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/512/2017HC Karnataka23 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 2(22)(e)Section 254Section 260

unexplained income of the Assessee under Section 69- A of the Act, a different provision. In the appeal filed before the High Court, the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court held in para-15 that the use of Date of Judgment :23-07-2018 I.T.A.No.512/2017 M/s. Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income