BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 92Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai172Delhi172Bangalore84Kolkata25Chennai24Pune24Ahmedabad23Hyderabad14Jaipur11Karnataka3Visakhapatnam2Indore2Agra2Cochin1Nagpur1Chandigarh1Raipur1Rajkot1Surat1Telangana1Varanasi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 2604Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 80J2Section 92C2Section 14A2Section 260A2Section 10A2Section 143(3)2Section 92A

PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-2 vs. M/S.EYGBS (INDIA) PVT LTD

ITA/107/2025HC Karnataka12 Sept 2025

Bench: CHIEF JUSTICE,C M JOSHI

Section 10ASection 14ASection 260Section 260A

disallowance was founded on the proviso to Section 92C(4) of the Act. - 12 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36360-DB ITA No. 107 of 2025 C/W ITA No. 106 of 2025 17. It is material to note that the TP adjustments are made pursuant to the APA entered into by the Assessee with CBDT. Section 92CC

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING

ITA/100012/2017HC Karnataka17 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

2
Transfer Pricing2
Deduction2
Section 143(3)
Section 144C
Section 144C(13)
Section 260A
Section 37(1)
Section 92A
Section 92C

disallowing @40%, the expenses on the same?” 21. Learned Standing Counsel Sri.Y.V.Raviraj has facilitated the order of the ITAT in IT(TP) A No.182 (Bang) 2014 of the assessment year 2009-10, wherein the ITAT has held that the assessee’s appeal directed against the assessment order passed by the A.O. under Section 144C (13) as per the directions

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 vs. M/S PAGE INDUSTRIES LTD

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

ITA/285/2017HC Karnataka08 Jan 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,R. NATARAJ

Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 260Section 80JSection 92C

disallowance of Rs.74,08,964/- under the provisions of Section 80JJAA of the Act were proposed. The 5 assessee thereupon filed objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel contesting all the additions. The Dispute Resolution Panel, however rejected the objections preferred by the assessee. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred