BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 92Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai720Delhi581Bangalore313Kolkata143Chennai70Ahmedabad51Hyderabad43Pune39Jaipur10Karnataka7Indore6Visakhapatnam5Surat4Raipur2Guwahati2Calcutta2Amritsar2Nagpur1Jabalpur1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 26010Disallowance6Transfer Pricing5Section 92C4Section 10A4Deduction4Addition to Income4Section 260A3Section 143(3)3Section 40

PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-2 vs. M/S.EYGBS (INDIA) PVT LTD

ITA/107/2025HC Karnataka12 Sept 2025

Bench: CHIEF JUSTICE,C M JOSHI

Section 10ASection 14ASection 260Section 260A

disallowance of 10% of the exempt income under Section 14A of the Act. 9. The Assessee appealed the assessment orders before the CIT(A). 10. The learned CIT(A), allowed the appeal and found that the exemption under Section 10AA of the Act could not be denied on the enhanced income and the proviso to Section 92C

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S OBULAPURAM MINING

ITA/100012/2017HC Karnataka17 Mar 2023

Bench: K.SOMASHEKAR,UMESH M ADIGA

3
Section 80J2
Section 14A2
Section 143(3)
Section 144C
Section 144C(13)
Section 260A
Section 37(1)
Section 92A
Section 92C

disallowing @40%, the expenses on the same?” 21. Learned Standing Counsel Sri.Y.V.Raviraj has facilitated the order of the ITAT in IT(TP) A No.182 (Bang) 2014 of the assessment year 2009-10, wherein the ITAT has held that the assessee’s appeal directed against the assessment order passed by the A.O. under Section 144C (13) as per the directions

SKF TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) P. LTD., vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The Appeal is disposed of

ITA/83/2017HC Karnataka19 Jun 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 40Section 92C

Section 92C of the Act required further investigation and therefore the learned Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer. Date of Judgment 19-06-2018, ITA No.83/2017 SKF Technologies [India] P. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 3/9 4. The other issue raised for the said Assessment Years above was also about the disallowance

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 vs. M/S PAGE INDUSTRIES LTD

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

ITA/285/2017HC Karnataka08 Jan 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,R. NATARAJ

Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 260Section 80JSection 92C

disallowance of Rs.74,08,964/- under the provisions of Section 80JJAA of the Act were proposed. The 5 assessee thereupon filed objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel contesting all the additions. The Dispute Resolution Panel, however rejected the objections preferred by the assessee. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S EDS ELECTRONICS DATA SYSTEMS INDIA PVT.LTD.

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

ITA/680/2015HC Karnataka15 Jan 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,R. NATARAJ

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 260Section 260ASection 80H

disallowances with regard to addition on account of income from other sources, addition on account of foreign exchange loss and addition on account of Arms 6 Length Price (ALP). 5. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who by an order dated 21.01.2009 inter alia held that respondent has earned a profit in technical

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S LUWA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

ITA/296/2017HC Karnataka29 Jun 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 148Section 260

disallowed the expenditure but only adopted the TPO's determination of ALP of the advertisement expenses. Therefore, the issue for examination in this appeal is only the issue of ALP as determined by the TPO in respect of advertisement expenses. The jurisdiction of the TPO is specific and limited i.e. to determine the ALP of an International Transaction in terms

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S TELELOGIC INDIA PVT LTD

ITA/550/2016HC Karnataka28 Jun 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 10ASection 260

disallowance of rent equalization provision for an amount of Rs.5,47,46,191/- even when the assessing authority has applied Accounting Standard -19 of principle of accountancy, which stipulated that if no liability were to exist against a provision, the Date of Judgment 28-06-2018, ITA No.550/2016 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 & another Vs. M/s Telelogic India