BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(2)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai251Bangalore170Cochin131Pune112Delhi77Chennai75Raipur71Panaji56Visakhapatnam52Ahmedabad48Kolkata48Surat42Hyderabad41Jaipur30Chandigarh30Rajkot22Indore16Nagpur10Varanasi10Lucknow9Amritsar9Cuttack8Karnataka7Telangana7SC3Kerala3Dehradun2Allahabad2Jodhpur2Jabalpur2Guwahati1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 26015Section 260A7Section 80P(2)(a)6Section 10A5Section 80P(4)4Deduction4Section 23Section 1943Section 1432Exemption

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/141/2020HC Karnataka21 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 143(2)Section 194Section 2Section 206ASection 40Section 80J

80P(2)(a)(i), notwithstanding that they may also be giving loans to their members which are not related to agriculture. Also, in case it is found that there are instances of loans being given to non-members, profits attributable to such loans obviously cannot be deducted. 12.6.2. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central)- I, New Delhi vs. Vatika Township

M/S THE TOTGARS CO-OPERATIVE SALE SOCIETY LTD., vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

2
Addition to Income2

In the result, we pass the following:

ITA/1568/2005HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: B.S PATIL,P.S.DINESH KUMAR

Section 260A

80P(2). Upon the pronouncement of the order by the Apex Court, in these appeals referred to supra, the income earned on the interest is declared as “other income” falling under Section 56 of the Income Tax Act. Then the next immediate question that follows is as to whether the entire fund i.e., in deposit with the Bank is taxable

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore-560035. ...APPELLANT (By Sri Venkataraman, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.B.Krishna, Adv.) AND : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(3), 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore-560035. ...APPELLANT (By Sri Venkataraman, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.B.Krishna, Adv.) AND : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(3), 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order

LOKMANYA MULTIPURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)

Appeal stands disposed of accordingly

ITA/100010/2015HC Karnataka21 Nov 2017

Bench: The Commissioner Of

Section 143Section 2Section 260Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowing the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of 3 Income Tax (Appeals) which came to be rejected. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal was preferred before the ITAT. The ITAT dismissed the same. Hence, this appeal is preferred under Section

PATIL CONSTRUCTION INFRASTRUCTURE vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Appeal stands disposed of accordingly

CMP/100010/2015HC Karnataka07 Jul 2017

Bench: The Commissioner Of

Section 143Section 2Section 260Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

disallowing the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of 3 Income Tax (Appeals) which came to be rejected. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal was preferred before the ITAT. The ITAT dismissed the same. Hence, this appeal is preferred under Section

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,

In the result, the appeal is disposed of in terms of

ITA/315/2012HC Karnataka09 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10ASection 14ASection 260Section 260ASection 36(1)(iv)Section 80

80P, DODDAKANNELLI SARJAPUR ROAD BENGALURU-560035 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. S. GANESH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADV., FOR SRI. R.B. KRISHNA, ADV.,) AND: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 12(5) 14/3, 4TH FLOOR, RASTROTHANA BHAVAN (OPP.) RBI, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADV.) - - - THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION