M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore-560035. ...APPELLANT (By Sri Venkataraman, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.B.Krishna, Adv.) AND : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(3), 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order

THE COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ANR vs. THE BIJAPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL

Bench: R.DEVDAS,VINEET KOTHARI

disallowance of such interest paid to the members without TDS, was liable to be made as per the provisions of Section 40 (a) (ia) of the Act. 4. Both the learned counsel at Bar fairly submitted that the said issue is no longer res-integra in view of the CBTD Circular No.19/2015 holding that such Co-operative Banks

CORPORATION BANK vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Accordingly, the petitions are allowed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

E R Heard the learned Senior Advocate Shri K P Kumar appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the revenue Shri K V Aravind. 2. These petitions are disposed of by this common order. The petitioners’ regular assessments were concluded by assessment orders dated 08.02.2012 and 21.03.2011 for 4 the years 2010-11 and 2009-10 respectively

CORPORATION BANK vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Accordingly, the petitions are allowed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

E R Heard the learned Senior Advocate Shri K P Kumar appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the revenue Shri K V Aravind. 2. These petitions are disposed of by this common order. The petitioners’ regular assessments were concluded by assessment orders dated 08.02.2012 and 21.03.2011 for 4 the years 2010-11 and 2009-10 respectively

KARNATAKA BANK LTD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX

Accordingly, the petition is allowed in

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

E R Heard the learned Senior Advocate Shri K P Kumar appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the revenue Shri K V Aravind. 2. The petitioner’s regular assessments was concluded by assessment order dated 09.03.2011 for the year 2009-10. Subsequently, the first respondent is said to have issued notice under Section 148 proposing

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,

In the result, the appeal is disposed of in terms of

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

80P, DODDAKANNELLI SARJAPUR ROAD BENGALURU-560035 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. S. GANESH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADV., FOR SRI. R.B. KRISHNA, ADV.,) AND: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 12(5) 14/3, 4TH FLOOR, RASTROTHANA BHAVAN (OPP.) RBI, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADV.) - - - THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION

UNIVERSAL CREDIT SOUHARDHA SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA vs. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

E. I. Sanmathi, Adv. for R2 & R3) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to stay the notice of demand dt. 25.12.2019 issued under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Annexure-F) and also the notice dt. 13.02.2020 (Annexure-J) issued by the respondent No.3 pending disposal of the appeal