BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai614Bangalore381Cochin259Chennai182Pune155Delhi124Panaji103Ahmedabad97Kolkata83Raipur75Visakhapatnam65Nagpur58Jaipur54Surat51Rajkot45Hyderabad39Lucknow32Indore31Chandigarh26Jodhpur15Amritsar13Varanasi10Karnataka9Kerala7Jabalpur6Telangana6Cuttack5SC4Allahabad2Dehradun2Calcutta2Patna1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 26012Section 80P11Section 260A11Section 80P(2)(d)6Section 80A5Deduction5Section 80P(2)(a)4Section 53Section 1943Addition to Income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/141/2020HC Karnataka21 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 143(2)Section 194Section 2Section 206ASection 40Section 80J

disallowed by the AO. The claim of the Assessee is this that if the worker is employed on permanent basis then only because in the present year, working days are less than 300 days because he was employed after 66 days from the start of the previous year then no deduction will be available under this section in respect

BELLADBAGEWADIKRISHISEVA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

3
Disallowance2
Revision u/s 2632

Appeals are allowed

ITA/100048/2014HC Karnataka21 Feb 2018

Bench: JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA,S.SUJATHA

Section 260ASection 80P(2)(a)

disallowing the claim of the Appellant under section 80P(2)(a)(i)?” 5. Learned Senior counsel Sri.M.V.Sheshachala representing of Sri Gangadhar J.M. and Sri Praveen Tarikar for the assessee would submit that the assessee : 8 : is a Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank. The Tribunal while considering the issue whether the appellant assessee is entitled to deduction under

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. THE TOTAGARS CO-OPERATIVE SALE SOCIETY,

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/100069/2016HC Karnataka05 Jan 2017

Bench: SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR,RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN

Section 10(34)Section 260ASection 80PSection 80P(1)Section 80P(2)(d)

C’ Bench, Bangalore, whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed six appeals filed by the Revenue against the respondent-assessee. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the respondent assessee is a Co-operative Credit Society providing credit facilities to its members, and marketing the agricultural produce of its members; it runs a kirana section, rice mills, van section

MADHU SOUHARDA PATHINA SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/207/2024HC Karnataka13 Jan 2026

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 260Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80P

2. This appeal is filed by the assessee challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Bengaluru (for short, “the Tribunal”) in ITA No. 969/Bang/2023 dated 02.01.2024, relating to the Assessment Year 2017–18. The assessee is assessed in the status of an Association of Persons

M/S WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/881/2008HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore-560035. ...APPELLANT (By Sri Venkataraman, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.B.Krishna, Adv.) AND : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(3), 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

The appeals stand disposed of, accordingly

ITA/211/2009HC Karnataka25 Mar 2015

Bench: N.KUMAR,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 260

80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore-560035. ...APPELLANT (By Sri Venkataraman, Senior Counsel for Dr.R.B.Krishna, Adv.) AND : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(3), 3rd Floor, Central Revenue Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. KURUHINSHETTY URBAN CO-OP

In the result, the appeal stands dismissed

ITA/100171/2015HC Karnataka06 Jan 2016

Bench: H.BILLAPPA,P.S.DINESH KUMAR

Section 260ASection 263Section 40Section 5Section 56Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

C .. RESPONDENT (By Sri.A.Shankar, Adv.) --- This ITA is filed u/S.260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 praying to formulate the substantial question of law stated above and allow the appeal and set aside the orders : 2 : passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, Panaji, in ITA.No.26/PNJ/2015, dt.15.7.2015 and confirm the order passed by the Income Tax Officer

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MOODBIDRI CO OPERATIVE SERVICES BANK LTD.,

ITA/185/2024HC Karnataka27 Jan 2025

Bench: KRISHNA S DIXIT,G BASAVARAJA

Section 260Section 260ASection 263Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the 1961 Act has been revived by setting aside the revisional order made by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. 2. Learned Sr. panel Counsel appearing for the Revenue has framed the following substantial questions of law which read as under: “1. Whether the Hon’ble ITAT is correct in considering the interest received

THE COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ANR vs. THE BIJAPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL

ITA/200014/2015HC Karnataka23 Mar 2018

Bench: R.DEVDAS,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

disallowance of such interest paid to the members without TDS, was liable to be made as per the provisions of Section 40 (a) (ia) of the Act. 4. Both the learned counsel at Bar fairly submitted that the said issue is no longer res-integra in view of the CBTD Circular No.19/2015 holding that such Co-operative Banks