BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai106Delhi71Bangalore63Raipur47Chennai33Surat26Ahmedabad15Kolkata13Indore13Rajkot12Pune11Karnataka7Jaipur7Jodhpur5Varanasi3SC3Telangana3Lucknow1Amritsar1Chandigarh1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 26018Section 10B8Section 107Section 260A4Deduction4

CGI INFORMATION SYSTEMS vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Appeals are allowed

ITA/686/2017HC Karnataka31 Oct 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

Section 260

disallowed the benefit under Section 10A of the IT Act for A.Y.1998-99. For the said reason among others, ITAT has dismissed the appeal concurring with the finding of the CIT(A). 7 (2017)88 taxmann.com 69 (SC) (para 13) - 9 - 11. In the assessment order for the A.Y. 1997-98, the AO has recorded thus: "3. As in the earlier

CGI INFORMATION SYSTEMS vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeals are allowed

ITA/609/2016HC Karnataka31 Oct 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

Section 260

disallowed the benefit under Section 10A of the IT Act for A.Y.1998-99. For the said reason among others, ITAT has dismissed the appeal concurring with the finding of the CIT(A). 7 (2017)88 taxmann.com 69 (SC) (para 13) - 9 - 11. In the assessment order for the A.Y. 1997-98, the AO has recorded thus: "3. As in the earlier

CGI INFORMATION SYSTEMS vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Appeals are allowed

ITA/608/2016HC Karnataka31 Oct 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

Section 260

disallowed the benefit under Section 10A of the IT Act for A.Y.1998-99. For the said reason among others, ITAT has dismissed the appeal concurring with the finding of the CIT(A). 7 (2017)88 taxmann.com 69 (SC) (para 13) - 9 - 11. In the assessment order for the A.Y. 1997-98, the AO has recorded thus: "3. As in the earlier

PR.COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT.LTD

In the result, we do not find any

ITA/571/2016HC Karnataka19 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B of the Act. 5. The Assessing Officer inter alia held that assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 10B of the Act only after verification and the contention of the assessee that old machinery from FFIPL was transferred to it only in April 2007 does not deserve acceptance

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT LTD

In the result, we do not find any

ITA/580/2016HC Karnataka19 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B of the Act. 5. The Assessing Officer inter alia held that assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 10B of the Act only after verification and the contention of the assessee that old machinery from FFIPL was transferred to it only in April 2007 does not deserve acceptance

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT LTD

In the result, we do not find any

ITA/559/2015HC Karnataka19 Oct 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 10Section 260Section 260A

disallowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 10B of the Act. 5. The Assessing Officer inter alia held that assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 10B of the Act only after verification and the contention of the assessee that old machinery from FFIPL was transferred to it only in April 2007 does not deserve acceptance

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. TRIDENT MINERALS (100% EOU)

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/100029/2014HC Karnataka10 Oct 2018

Bench: H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD,B.VEERAPPA

Section 10Section 10BSection 10B(2)(iii)Section 139Section 260ASection 80I

disallowance of excess profits amounting to Rs.4,76,52,385/- due to transactions with sister concerns from computation of the eligible deduction under Section 10B of the Act, was withdrawn by the assessee, when actually it was not so. 2. It is the case of the assessee that they carry business of production, manufacture and export of iron