BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai182Delhi98Pune87Chennai64Bangalore63Kolkata59Hyderabad36Surat32Jaipur26Ahmedabad23Raipur17Indore17Ranchi14Panaji10Karnataka5SC4Jodhpur2Chandigarh2Cochin2Lucknow2Rajkot2Cuttack1Calcutta1Visakhapatnam1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Amritsar1Allahabad1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 2606Section 260A3Section 353Deduction3Section 572Section 24(1)2Section 42Section 62

M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

WP/7004/2014HC Karnataka24 Apr 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

5A) The prescribed authority shall, if he is satisfied that the conditions provided in this rule and in sub-section (2AB) of 26 section 35 of the Act are fulfilled, pass an order in writing in Form No.3CM: Provided that a reasonable opportunity of being heard shall be granted to the company before rejecting an application. (6) The National Laboratory

M/S MYSORE POLYMERS & RUBBER PRODUCTS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

In the result, writ appeal No

STRP/112/2008HC Karnataka17 Jun 2013

Bench: D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR,B.S.INDRAKALA

Section 23(1)Section 24(1)Section 4Section 6

5A, 5B, 5C or 6. It is submitted in this regard that the argument of the assessee that it is exempted but it is still liable to tax, is not an argument 27 that can be accepted as the benefit of no tax liability in the case of assessee or dealers covered by the 2nd and 3rd proviso to Section

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GULBARGA vs. M/S MANJUNATHA COTTON AND GINNING FACTORY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/2564/2005HC Karnataka13 Dec 2012

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,N.KUMAR

Section 260Section 260A

section 271. For starting the penalty proceedings under this clause, the condition precedent is that the Assessing Officer must be satisfied that a person has concealed particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. 51 The ingredients which go to make up the conditions precedent to the infliction of penalty are: (i) the Assessing Officer

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S JSW STEEL LIMITED

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

ITA/385/2010HC Karnataka13 Feb 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,RAVI V HOSMANI

Section 260Section 57

5A, Dr. G Deshmukh Marg. Mumbai 40026 …RESPONDENT (By Sri. A Shankar, Senior Advocate, a/w Sri Venkatesh K Pani, Advocate) 2 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31.5.2010 PASSED IN ITA NO.931/BANG/2009,FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JSW STEEL LIMITED

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA/139/2011HC Karnataka09 Jun 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 260ASection 43B

5A, DR G DESHMUKH MARG, MUMBAI 400 026. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI A.SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI M LAVA, ADV.) 2 - - - THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10-12-2010 PASSED IN ITA NO.929/BANG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003-2004, PRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, II. ALLOW