BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 4Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi579Mumbai515Chennai197Bangalore187Kolkata114Jaipur106Ahmedabad90Cochin75Hyderabad74Indore44Pune42Lucknow28Allahabad24Chandigarh23Nagpur19Rajkot18Surat18Amritsar12SC12Visakhapatnam11Raipur10Karnataka7Varanasi7Cuttack7Guwahati6Jodhpur5Patna2Punjab & Haryana2Kerala2Agra2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1Dehradun1Panaji1Telangana1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 260A8Section 80H8Section 117Section 2606Section 245Section 271(1)(c)4Charitable Trust3Exemption3Depreciation3Disallowance

RNS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

In the result, writ petitions are allowed

WP/46275/2016HC Karnataka07 Dec 2016

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy Writ Petition Nos.46275-46289 Of 2016 (T-It)

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 156Section 245Section 245DSection 245D(4)Section 271(1)(C)

4A) of the Act, the proceedings shall abate on the specified date. Respondent No.1 having not passed its order on or before the due date, could not have passed an order determining the total income for various years and deciding to impose penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for all the six years as per its order

3
Addition to Income3
Deduction3

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. MOOGAMBIGAI

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/1/2017HC Karnataka09 Mar 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,ASHOK S.KINAGI

Section 11Section 260Section 260A

disallowances. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Commissioner of Income Tax 4 (Appeals) maintained the order of the Assessing Officer in respect of the aforesaid reliefs, however, granted the relief in respect of the remaining issues. Accordingly, the appeal was partly allowed. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Income

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

OLR/1/2017HC Karnataka20 Apr 2017

Bench: RAGHVENDRA S.CHAUHAN

Section 11Section 260Section 260A

disallowances. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Commissioner of Income Tax 4 (Appeals) maintained the order of the Assessing Officer in respect of the aforesaid reliefs, however, granted the relief in respect of the remaining issues. Accordingly, the appeal was partly allowed. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Income

THE COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ANR vs. THE BIJAPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL

ITA/200014/2015HC Karnataka23 Mar 2018

Bench: R.DEVDAS,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

disallowance of such interest paid to the members without TDS, was liable to be made as per the provisions of Section 40 (a) (ia) of the Act. 4. Both the learned counsel at Bar fairly submitted that the said issue is no longer res-integra in view of the CBTD Circular No.19/2015 holding that such Co-operative Banks

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GARNIWAL EXPORTS (P) LTD

Appeal is allowed

ITA/100/2007HC Karnataka06 Jun 2013

Bench: D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR,B.S.INDRAKALA

Section 260Section 80H

disallowed the deduction claimed in respect of the price of Rs.17,78,155/- received by the assessee by way of transfer of quota opining that the amount represented business income of the assessee; that it cannot be attributed to any export activity as the amount is not by export but received 4 within the country; that Section 80HHC benefit being

M/S CUTCHI MEMON UNION vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITA/534/2013HC Karnataka28 Sept 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.I.ARUN

Section 11Section 139Section 2(24)Section 2(45)Section 24Section 260Section 260A

disallowed. The assessee thereupon filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who by an order dated 27.04.2012, by placing reliance on decision of Calcutta High Court in CIT VS. JAYASHREE CHARITY TRUST, 159 ITR 280 (Cal) and decision of Gujarat High Court in CIT VS. GANGA CHARITY TRUST FUND, 162 ITR 612 (Guj) set aside the order

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE SANDUR MANGANESE and IRON ORES LTD

ITA/932/2006HC Karnataka31 Jul 2013

Bench: N.KUMAR,H.S.KEMPANNA

Section 1ASection 260Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 4A

Section 4A thereto. Hence he directed penalty proceedings u/S 271(1)(c) be initiated. 4. After initiating an independent proceedings for levy of penalty by an order dated 22.12.1999 he imposed a minimum and maximum penalty on the concealed income of Rs.49,96,267/- at Rs.22,98,284/- and Rs.68,94,852/- respectively and a penalty of Rs.22