Search: disallowance

10 results for “disallowance”+ Section 33Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi60 Mumbai56 Bangalore21 Chennai17 Kolkata16 Hyderabad15 Ahmedabad15 Jaipur12 Karnataka10 Telangana7 Pune4 Allahabad4 Indore3 Cochin2 Chandigarh2 Surat2 Jodhpur2 Guwahati1 Punjab & Haryana1 SC1 Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 26019 Section 10B14 Section 10A10 Section 108 Deduction8 Section 260A7 Section 1484 Disallowance4 Section 143(3)3 Section 194

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/141/2020HC Karnataka21 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 143(2)Section 194Section 2Section 206ASection 40Section 80J

disallowed under Section 43- B which, as stated above, was inserted with effect from 1st April, 1984. It is also relevant to note that the first proviso which came into force with effect from 1st April, 1988 was not on the statute book when the assessments were made in the case of Allied Motors (P) Limited (supra). However, the Assessee

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S SYNGENE

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S SYNGENE

M/S NANDI STEELS LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

M/S GRANITE MART LIMITED vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER

PR.COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT.LTD

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT LTD

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S JEANS KNIT PVT LTD

M/S METRIX PRECISION COMPONENTS PVT. LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

M/S SUBEX LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SHRIRAM CHITS