BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi108Mumbai106Kolkata76Bangalore28Raipur18Chennai14Jaipur9Ahmedabad8Visakhapatnam6Cochin6Pune5Karnataka4Hyderabad4Chandigarh3Jodhpur2Kerala1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 2605Section 405Section 1943TDS3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 194I2Section 1472Section 201(1)2Section 40a

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/141/2020HC Karnataka21 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Section 143(2)Section 194Section 2Section 206ASection 40Section 80J

disallowance made under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) for sum of Rs.7,87,93,536/- claimed towards finance of cars by holding that assessing authority did not invoke the provisions of section 194I

M/S TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR P LTD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal is allowed

2
Section 206A2
Deduction2
ITA/245/2018HC Karnataka24 Mar 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.G.S. KAMAL

Section 201(1)Section 260Section 260ASection 40a

disallowances made under Section 40a(i) and (ia) of the Act. The assessee thereupon furnished the information vide communication dated 12.08.2013. 4. The Assessing Officer initiated the proceeding under Section 201 and 201(1A) of the Act and treated the assessee as assessee in default in respect of the 6 amount made in provision, which was reversed / un- utilized

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. SHRI MAHALINGAM

In the result, the appeal

ITA/378/2016HC Karnataka21 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 147Section 194ISection 260Section 40

disallowance 3 under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act ought to be restricted to the amounts remaining outstanding, on which TDS was not made during the relevant previous year and not on the amounts which were actually paid during the previous year?’ 2. The facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee claims

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. SHRI MAHALINGAM

In the result, the appeal

ITA/377/2016HC Karnataka21 Dec 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 147Section 194ISection 260Section 40

disallowance 3 under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act ought to be restricted to the amounts remaining outstanding, on which TDS was not made during the relevant previous year and not on the amounts which were actually paid during the previous year?’ 2. The facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee claims