BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai166Delhi121Kolkata49Ahmedabad26Chennai13Bangalore10Surat9Jaipur9Pune5Karnataka3Guwahati3Nagpur3Rajkot3Punjab & Haryana1Telangana1Hyderabad1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 115J9Section 2605Section 260A2

M/S BEST TRADING & AGENCIES LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the orders passed by the

ITA/32/2012HC Karnataka26 Aug 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 115JSection 260Section 260A

115J(1), therefore, the submission of the assessee that Section 115JB is not applicable to the fact situation of the case cannot be accepted. It is further submitted that Section 115JA(4) and Section 115JB(5) deals with post determination of the profit under the Companies Act. It is further submitted that if the contention of the assessee that Section

M/S BEST TRADING & AGENCIES LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the orders passed by the

ITA/191/2011HC Karnataka
26 Aug 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Section 115JSection 260Section 260A

115J(1), therefore, the submission of the assessee that Section 115JB is not applicable to the fact situation of the case cannot be accepted. It is further submitted that Section 115JA(4) and Section 115JB(5) deals with post determination of the profit under the Companies Act. It is further submitted that if the contention of the assessee that Section

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S IBM INDIA LTD

The Appeal is partly allowed

ITA/130/2007HC Karnataka10 Apr 2013

Bench: B.MANOHAR,N.KUMAR

Section 115JSection 234Section 234BSection 260Section 4

disallowance of Rs.4,92,69,808/-. 7 5. Learned counsel for the Revenue contends though now the said issue is covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ROTORK CONTROLS INDIA (P) LIMITED –vs- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX reported in (2009) 314 ITR 62. Such a relief is permissible only if the condition