BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

531 results for “disallowance”+ Section 11(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai15,323Delhi12,612Bangalore4,454Chennai4,346Kolkata3,824Ahmedabad2,750Pune1,814Hyderabad1,672Jaipur1,472Surat991Indore872Chandigarh827Cochin689Raipur618Karnataka531Rajkot508Visakhapatnam430Amritsar415Nagpur404Cuttack378Lucknow326Panaji213Agra197Jodhpur192Guwahati143Telangana137Allahabad124SC113Ranchi112Patna109Dehradun96Calcutta79Jabalpur54Varanasi47Kerala43Punjab & Haryana21Rajasthan11Orissa9Himachal Pradesh7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Andhra Pradesh1Tripura1Uttarakhand1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 260130Section 260A52Addition to Income39Disallowance37Deduction35Section 80I25Section 10A24Section 143(3)22Section 115J19Depreciation

M/S MYSORE POLYMERS & RUBBER PRODUCTS LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

In the result, writ appeal No

STRP/112/2008HC Karnataka17 Jun 2013

Bench: D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR,B.S.INDRAKALA

Section 23(1)Section 24(1)Section 4Section 6

11-A of Part `F', Serial Number 12 of Part `M' and [Serial Number 5 of Part `P' and Serial Number 1 of Part `K'] of the Second Schedule, the sale by one oil company to another oil company shall not be deemed to be a sale by the first or the earliest of successive dealers in the State

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE

ITA/106/2016HC Karnataka27 Sept 2018

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),S.G.PANDIT

Showing 1–20 of 531 · Page 1 of 27

...
18
Section 14817
Section 14A16
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 260

disallowed the claim of depreciation, as per the provisions of Section 11 of the Act. Further, he held that claim of depreciation amounted to double deduction, as the respondent-Trust had availed 100% exemption of Capital Expenditure in the previous year as application of income. Further, more specifically for the assessment year 2009-10, the Assessing Officer also held that

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI SRI ADICHUNCHUNAGIRI SHIKSHANA TRUST

In the result, all the appeals are

ITA/384/2016HC Karnataka28 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 12ASection 144Section 260Section 263

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI ADICHUNCHUNGIRI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/233/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 9 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. SRI ADICHUNCHANAGIRI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/1/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 9 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION (MEDICAL)

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/430/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 9 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/431/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 9 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA REDDY JANASANGHA

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/56/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 9 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/414/2010HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 9 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS vs. AL-AMEEN CHARITABLE FUND TRUST

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/62/2010HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

6. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the revenue is in appeal. 9 7. Similarly, in ITA Nos.233-234/2013, ITA No.1/2013, ITA No.433/2013, ITA No.414/2010, on the assessment orders denying exemption under Section 11 read with Section 10(23c) of the Act and making an addition of income on account of disallowance

M/S J K CEMENT WORKS vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

STRP/100001/2014HC Karnataka23 Mar 2017

Bench: H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 63Section 65Section 65(1)

6) tax paid on purchases attributable to naptha, liquified petroleum gas, furnace oil, [XXX] superior kerosene oil, kerosene and any other petroleum product, when used as fuel in motor vehicles, but when used as fuel in production of any goods for sale in the course of export out of the territory of India or taxable goods or captive power, input

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PRAVEEN V DODDANAVAR

ITA/100003/2014HC Karnataka20 Feb 2017

Bench: SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 63Section 65Section 65(1)

6) tax paid on purchases attributable to naptha, liquified petroleum gas, furnace oil, [XXX] superior kerosene oil, kerosene and any other petroleum product, when used as fuel in motor vehicles, but when used as fuel in production of any goods for sale in the course of export out of the territory of India or taxable goods or captive power, input

THE BAILHONGAL URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/100001/2014HC Karnataka16 Dec 2015

Bench: S.ABDUL NAZEER,P.S.DINESH KUMAR

Section 63Section 65Section 65(1)

6) tax paid on purchases attributable to naptha, liquified petroleum gas, furnace oil, [XXX] superior kerosene oil, kerosene and any other petroleum product, when used as fuel in motor vehicles, but when used as fuel in production of any goods for sale in the course of export out of the territory of India or taxable goods or captive power, input

M/S KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed and the impugned

ITA/11/2021HC Karnataka05 Feb 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 36(1)Section 39(1)Section 66(1)Section 70

disallowing ITC on the purchase of sawdust from an unregistered dealer, the Prescribed Authority has - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52370-DB STA No. 11 of 2021 referred to the provisions of Section

COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX vs. OHIO UNIVERSITY CHRIST COLLEGE

ITA/312/2016HC Karnataka17 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 12ASection 260

section 11 of the Act and the assessee has not been granted such exemption by CBDT vide a special order ? (2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in confirming the order of the CIT directing the assessing authority to allow the claim of assessee for set off of brought forward excess

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. KSRTC EMPLOYEES DEATH-CUM-RETIREMENT BENEFIT

Appeals stand dismissed

ITA/242/2007HC Karnataka27 Nov 2013

Bench: N.KUMAR,RATHNAKALA

Section 10Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 148Section 260A

disallowed the claim for exemption. However, he held that the assessee has obtained the necessary approval under Section 10(23AAA) of the Act. Assessee is an Association having the employees of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation as its member. The return of Income is filed in the status of AOP. The object of the Association is to render monetary assistance

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KRUPANIDHI EDUCATION

ITA/306/2015HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 260Section 28Section 32Section 35(2)(iv)

section 11 on commercial principles after providing for allowance for normal depreciation and deduction thereof from gross income of the Trust. In view of the aforestated Judgment of the Bombay High Court, we answer question No. 1 in the affirmative i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the department. 4. Question No. 2 herein is identical to the question

PR.COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S SACKHUMVIT TRUST

ITA/394/2018HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 15Section 260Section 32Section 70

section 11 on commercial principles after providing for allowance for normal depreciation and deduction thereof from gross income of the Trust. In view of the aforestated Judgment of the Bombay High Court, we answer question No. 1 in the affirmative i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the department. 4. Question No. 2 herein is identical to the question

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. ANJUMAN-E-ISLAM

ITA/428/2018HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 15Section 260Section 32Section 70

section 11 on commercial principles after providing for allowance for normal depreciation and deduction thereof from gross income of the Trust. In view of the aforestated Judgment of the Bombay High Court, we answer question No. 1 in the affirmative i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the department. 4. Question No. 2 herein is identical to the question

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. SHUSHRUTHA EDUCATIONAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/862/2017HC Karnataka21 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260

disallowance of accumulation/set apart of income under Section Date of Order 21-08-2018 I.T.A.No.862/2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) & Anr. Vs. Shushrutha Educational Trust 4/27 11(1)(a) without appreciating the fact that the issue of application of income more than the income computed does not arise, except in a case where the assessee has incurred huge amount