THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. STATE BANK OF MYSORE

In the result, the order passed by the tribunal

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

addition / disallowances to the taxable income, in addition to the one's already made in the order dated 27.03.2006. 6 3. The assessee

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI D M PURNESH

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,RAVI V HOSMANI

additions. The aforesaid order was challenged before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) by the assessee. The appeal preferred by the assessee was allowed. Being aggrieved, the revenue challenged the aforesaid order in appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by 6 order dated 16.04.2010 dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue and partly allowed

M/S T T K PRESTIGE LTD vs. THE UNION OF INDIA REPTD BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice P.B. Bajanthri W.P. No.26037/2005 C/W W.P.No.4464/2007 & W.P.No.27087/2005(It)

additional income Tax. In this backdrop, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that Article 265 of the Constitution provides for not to impose taxes save by authority of Law and Article 246 List I and Entry 17 No.82 deals with Taxes on income other than Agriculture income. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that on perusal

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU vs. M/S. CANARA BANK

The appeal stands disposed of as

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,R. NATARAJ

addition to book profits under Section 115 JB towards expenditure on exempt income is purely academic in nature as the Tribunal has held that no disallowance

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4 vs. M/S STERLING DEVELOPERS

In the result, we do not find any merit in the

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

additions and disallowances. The Assessing Officer also made a disallowance under Section 14A of the Act of Rs.4,92,78,160/- and under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income

PR. COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S STERLING DEVELOPERS

In the result, we do not find any merit in the

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

additions and disallowances. The Assessing Officer also made a disallowance under Section 14A of the Act of Rs.4,92,78,160/- and under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income

RNS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

In the result, writ petitions are allowed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy Writ Petition Nos.46275-46289 Of 2016 (T-It)

additional undisclosed income declared before the respondent No.1. The respondent No.1 allowed the application on 18th February 2014 under Section 245-D(1) of the 5 Act so as to proceed with it. After considering the report of the respondent No.2, respondent No.1 passed an order under Section 245D(2C) of the Act on 3rd April 2014 holding that

INGERSOLL-RAND (INDIA) LIMITED vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1

In the result, the appeals are

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.NAGAPRASANNA

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX RANGE-6(1), MUMBAI. ... RESPONDENTS 3 (By Sri. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) - - - THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF I.T. ACT 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30/8/2010 PASSED IN PREVIOUS YEAR NO.3952/MUM/2005, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE

COFFEEDAY GLOBAL LTD. vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the orders dated 21

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,ASHOK S.KINAGI

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-11 BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK BANGALORE - 560095. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560095. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-11 BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560095. 4 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.N.C. SRIDHAR, ADV.) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AMALGAMATED BEAN COFFEE TRADING CO LTD

In the result, the orders dated 21

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,ASHOK S.KINAGI

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-11 BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK BANGALORE - 560095. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560095. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-11 BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560095. 4 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.N.C. SRIDHAR, ADV.) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER

COFFEEDAY GLOBAL LTD. vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the orders dated 21

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,ASHOK S.KINAGI

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-11 BANGALORE, BMTC BUILDING KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK BANGALORE - 560095. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560095. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-11 BMTC BUILDING, 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560095. 4 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.N.C. SRIDHAR, ADV.) - - - THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. SHRI G BALRAJ, PWD

In the result, question No

Bench: S.N.SATYANARAYANA,JAYANT PATEL

income and therefore the disallowance and the resultant addition in the income was deleted. In the appeal before the Tribunal

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI H NAGARAJA

Bench: S SUNIL DUTT YADAV,B.S PATIL

disallowed the expenses claimed by the assessee under the heads, ‘labour charges’, ‘expenses of commission’ and ‘work in progress’, with a direction to the Assessing Officer to enhance the total income in terms of the findings recorded by him. The 3 Assessing Officer had been further directed by the Commissioner to initiate penalty proceedings under Section

SHRI. SHANKARLAL GILADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,

Bench: G.NARENDAR,M.NAGAPRASANNA

Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short). The appellant appeared and furnished all the details. The Assessing Officer concluded the proceedings under Section 143(3) of the Act and passed an order on 17.11.2015 making one addition which was disallowance

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA REDDY JANASANGHA

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation by the Assessing Officer. 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation by the Assessing Officer. 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION (MEDICAL)

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation by the Assessing Officer. 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation by the Assessing Officer. 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee