PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S NOVELL SOFTWARE

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

TP order) demonstrates that the revenues are more or less consistent for the Date of Judgment 18-07-2018 I.T.A.No.334/2015 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr Vs. M/s. Novell Software Development (India) Pvt. Ltd., 8/14 previous financial years and has only substantially decreased in the financial year 2004-05. The relevant extract of the Annual Report (Page

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MPHASIS LTD

The appeal is dismissed accordingly

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

TP)A. No.242/Bang/2014 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. The facts of the case reveal that the respondent – assessee is a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of providing software development services to its group of companies. It is a subsidiary of Mphasis group. The return of income for the assessment

SMT. PUNEETHA @ PUNEETHA B. A. vs. SRI. D. RAVI

The appeal is dismissed accordingly

Bench: R DEVDAS

TP)A. No.242/Bang/2014 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. The facts of the case reveal that the respondent – assessee is a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of providing software development services to its group of companies. It is a subsidiary of Mphasis group. The return of income for the assessment

M/S FIDELITY BUSINESS SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

TP)A No.461/Bang/2016 (Annexure F), to the extent questioned herein; in the interest of justice & equity etc. This I.T.A. having been heard and reserved on 12-07-2018, coming on for Pronouncement of Judgment, this day, Dr Vineet Kothari, J, delivered the following: J U D G M E N T Mr. Percy Pardiwala. Sr. Counsel a/w Mrs. Tanmayee Rajkumar