BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 72Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai79Chennai34Kolkata25Delhi24Bangalore16Ahmedabad10Hyderabad7Pune7Karnataka3Jaipur2SC2Raipur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 72A4Set Off of Losses3Section 260A2Section 72A(2)(a)2Section 2602Depreciation2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S K B D SUGARS & DISTILLERIES LTD.,

ITA/773/2009HC Karnataka16 Oct 2015

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET SARAN

Section 260ASection 72ASection 72A(2)(a)

depreciation under that Section, the asset should be ‘used’ for business, meaning thereby, after business commences, which is different from engagement in business. This, to our understanding, only clarifies that the phrases ‘commencement of business’ and ‘engaged in business’ are different. Former may apply for Section 32 but the latter would apply in the case of Section 72A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. INDUS FILA LTD

In the result, the order passed by the Income Tax

ITA/431/2012HC Karnataka18 Sept 2020

ALOK ARADHE,H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Bench:
Section 260Section 260ASection 72Section 72ASection 72A(2)(b)

Section 72A(1)(2) & (3), which read as under: Provisions relating to carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KBD SUGARS & DISTILLERIES LTD

ITA/169/2014HC Karnataka30 Jun 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

Section 2Section 260Section 724Section 72A

72A (4) of the Act, because the unit belonging to MOL was dysfunctional since 1999 and it was not a 'going concern' and does not satisfy the demerger defined under the Act and violates sub-clause (vi) of Section 2(19AA) of the Act. 6. In reply, Shri. Shankar, learned Senior Advocate submitted that: • The transaction of purchase of windmills