BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi13Mumbai10Cochin7Karnataka7Ahmedabad3Chennai2Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 2608Exemption7Depreciation7Set Off of Losses7Carry Forward of Losses7Section 268A6Charitable Trust6Deduction6Section 325Section 112

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. G. M. EDUCATION TRUST

ITA/1046/2017HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 260Section 268ASection 32

Section 268A the said decision is not biding in respect of this assessee? 3. This Court in case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune Vs. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona’ [2018] 89 taxmann.com 127 [SC] with regard to allowability and Depreciation

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ACADEMY OF LIBERAL EDUCATION

ITA/553/2017HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260
Section 268A
Section 32

Section 268A the said decision is not binding in respect of this assesse? 3. This Court in case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona’ [2018] 89 taxmann.com 127 [SC] with regard to allowability and Depreciation

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ACADEMY OF GENERAL EDUCATION

ITA/371/2014HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 268A

Section 268A the said decision is not binding in respect of this assessee? 2.3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal were justified in law in failing to take cognizance of the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Dharmendra Textiles Processors

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BHAGWAN MAHAVEER

ITA/317/2018HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 260Section 268ASection 32

Section 268A the said decision is not binding in respect of this assessee?” 3. This Court in case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona’ [2018] 89 taxmann.com 127 [SC] with regard to allowability and Depreciation

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MANIPAL HOTEL &

ITA/555/2017HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 268ASection 32

Section 268A the said decision is not binding in respect of this assessee? 3. This Court in case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona’ [2018] 89 taxmann.com 127 [SC] with regard to allowability and Depreciation

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT KAMALA

ITA/880/2017HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 268ASection 32

Section 268A the said decision is not binding in respect of this assessee? Date of Judgment 14-08-2018 I.T.A.No.880/2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) & another Vs. Smt.Kamala and Sri.Venkappa M Agadi 4/21 3. This Court in case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona’ [2018] 89 taxmann.com 127 [SC] with regard

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. DR T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION

ITA/346/2014HC Karnataka30 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260

Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arising from the order of learned Tribunal dated 21.03.2014 in ITA No.1140/Bang/2013 for the Assessment Year 2010-2011 - The Asst. CIT vs. Dr.T.M.A.Pai Foundation.. 2. The suggested substantial questions of law in the memo of appeal of Revenue are quoted below for ready reference:- Date of Judgment