BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 207clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai339Delhi339Chennai107Bangalore77Kolkata60Raipur33Ahmedabad31Jaipur26Chandigarh13Indore13Lucknow12Kerala11Hyderabad10Visakhapatnam9Pune9Cuttack8Telangana8SC5Ranchi5Karnataka3Surat3Jodhpur2Guwahati2Rajasthan2Allahabad1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Rajkot1Orissa1Nagpur1Amritsar1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 353Section 2602Section 1482Depreciation2Deduction2

MPHASIS LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/55355/2017HC Karnataka21 Jan 2020

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit

Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 40

depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the concerned assessment year. However, where an assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 has been made for the relevant assessment year, no action can be taken under section 147 after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless any income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CANARA BANK

ITA/207/2019
HC Karnataka
05 Dec 2022

Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

Section 14ASection 260Section 36(1)

207 OF 2019 C/W ITA No. 208 OF 2019 depreciation in value of investment in HTM Securities ignoring the fact that HTM Securities are treated as stock-in-trade by the assessee-bank and depreciation has been claimed in all the assessment years? 4. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal is right

M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

WP/7004/2014HC Karnataka24 Apr 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

207 Taxman 216 (Delhi) CIT vs. Sandan Vikas (India) Ltd., (3) (1976) 105 ITR 864 (All) J K Synthetics vs. ITO (4) (2012) 210 Taxman 432 (Guj.) Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Asstt.) vs. Mastek Ltd., (5) (1973) 87 ITR 539 (SC) Raza Textiles Ltd., vs. Income Tax Officer, Rampur (6) (2003) 128 Taxman 190 Hemalatha Gargya