BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 144C(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai662Delhi580Bangalore335Chennai83Kolkata82Hyderabad53Ahmedabad41Pune30Indore9Cochin9Jaipur9Karnataka6Dehradun6Surat5Visakhapatnam3Panaji2Kerala2Raipur1Rajkot1SC1Guwahati1Telangana1Lucknow1Chandigarh1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7Section 2636Section 1475Section 1485Section 244A5Section 353Section 2603Addition to Income3Section 144C(13)2Depreciation

WIPRO LIMITED vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/20040/2019HC Karnataka25 Aug 2021

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Krishna S.Dixit Writ Petition No.20040/2019 (T-It) Between:

Section 1Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 254Section 92C

144C(1), to which petitioner filed his Objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (hereafter 'DRP'); in terms of DRP order dated 17.09.2012, the JCIT assessed the income at Rs.2389,89,57,307/- against the original amount of Rs.588,08,04,584/- supra. (b) Both the Assessee and the Revenue having appealed against the above, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereafter

M/S TEJAS NETWORKS LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

2
WP/7004/2014HC Karnataka24 Apr 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 35Section 35(1)(i)

depreciation. (5) Where, in a scheme of amalgamation, xxx asset.” Definitions of certain terms relevant to income from profits and gains of business or profession. 43. In sections 28 to 41 and in this section, unless the context otherwise requires— (1) "actual cost" means xxx section 47. (2) "paid" means actually xxx profession. (3) "plant" includes xxx fittings

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. TE CONNECTIVITY INDIA PVT. LTD.,

Accordingly dispose of the appeal as allowed

ITA/53/2024HC Karnataka05 Jun 2025

Bench: ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE,S RACHAIAH

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 260ASection 263Section 40

144C(13) of the Act on 25.10.2019. Subsequently, the PCIT issued a notice under Section 263 of the Act seeking to revise the final assessment order dated 25.10.2019 and rejecting the objections of the respondent, passed the revisionary order dated 30.03.2022 (Annexure E) holding that the assessment - 10 - ITA No.53 of 2024 order was erroneous inasmuch as it was prejudicial

DELL INDIA PVT LTD vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/8901/2015HC Karnataka23 Mar 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 147Section 148

144C of the Act came to be passed on 31.01.2014, Annexure-H. Being aggrieved by the same petitioner is said to have filed an appeal and same is filed before first appellate authority and same is pending. 3. First respondent has issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act to the petitioner-assessee on 27.03.2014 Annexure

HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT LTD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the assessee's appeal for

ITA/433/2018HC Karnataka20 May 2025

Bench: V KAMESWAR RAO,S RACHAIAH

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 260Section 263

depreciation on the aforesaid additions for the impugned Assessment Year. A revised return filed on 31.03.2010 was taken-up for scrutiny by the Assessing Officer, which was concluded by the order dated 29.10.2012 passed under Section 143(3) r/w. Section 144C

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 vs. M/S SAPA EXTRUSION INDIA PVT LTD

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby

ITA/680/2019HC Karnataka10 Mar 2020

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.NAGAPRASANNA

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 260

Section 143(3) read with 144C of the Act by which the assessee’s loss was determined at `31,49,38,785/- by disallowing the depreciation