BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “depreciation”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi27Bangalore16Mumbai16Lucknow11Kolkata10Chennai10Karnataka8Pune8Jaipur5Agra3Ahmedabad3Indore2Amritsar2Nagpur1Raipur1SC1Patna1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 260A50Section 143(3)3Section 2633

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CISCO SYSTEMS

The appeals are allowed; the impugned

ITA/27/2019HC Karnataka18 Jun 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,R. NATARAJ

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 260ASection 263Section 32

depreciation for the following previous year and deemed to be part of that allowance, or if there is no such allowance for that previous year, be deemed to be the allowance for that previous year, and so on for the succeeding previous years.” 13.2 Section 143(3) of the Act of 1961 reads as under; “(3) [On the day specified

M/S. MARMON FOOD AND BEVERAGE TECHNOLOGIES INDIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/727/2017
HC Karnataka
09 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 260A

144A without giving opportunity of being heard? The appeal is admitted on the aforesaid questions of law after hearing the parties at length. 7. There are four connected appeals involving the same subject matter and a memo has been preferred by the assessee- appellant stating categorically that he is not pressing certain questions of law and permission has been sought

M/S. MARMON FOOD AND BEVERAGE TECHNOLOGIES INDIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/726/2017HC Karnataka09 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 260A

144A without giving opportunity of being heard? The appeal is admitted on the aforesaid questions of law after hearing the parties at length. 7. There are four connected appeals involving the same subject matter and a memo has been preferred by the assessee- appellant stating categorically that he is not pressing certain questions of law and permission has been sought

M/S. MARMON FOOD AND BEVERAGE TECHNOLOGIES INDIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/206/2018HC Karnataka09 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 260A

144A without giving opportunity of being heard? The appeal is admitted on the aforesaid questions of law after hearing the parties at length. 7. There are four connected appeals involving the same subject matter and a memo has been preferred by the assessee- appellant stating categorically that he is not pressing certain questions of law and permission has been sought

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S.GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY

ITA/11/2014HC Karnataka09 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 260A

144A without giving opportunity of being heard? The appeal is admitted on the aforesaid questions of law after hearing the parties at length. 7. There are four connected appeals involving the same subject matter and a memo has been preferred by the assessee- appellant stating categorically that he is not pressing certain questions of law and permission has been sought

M/S. MARMON FOOD AND BEVERAGE TECHNOLOGIES INDIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/725/2017HC Karnataka09 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 260A

144A without giving opportunity of being heard? The appeal is admitted on the aforesaid questions of law after hearing the parties at length. 7. There are four connected appeals involving the same subject matter and a memo has been preferred by the assessee- appellant stating categorically that he is not pressing certain questions of law and permission has been sought

M/S. MARMON FOOD AND BEVERAGE TECHNOLOGIES INDIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/728/2017HC Karnataka09 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 260A

144A without giving opportunity of being heard? The appeal is admitted on the aforesaid questions of law after hearing the parties at length. 7. There are four connected appeals involving the same subject matter and a memo has been preferred by the assessee- appellant stating categorically that he is not pressing certain questions of law and permission has been sought

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S.GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY

ITA/12/2014HC Karnataka09 Apr 2021

Bench: SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,V SRISHANANDA

Section 260A

144A without giving opportunity of being heard? The appeal is admitted on the aforesaid questions of law after hearing the parties at length. 7. There are four connected appeals involving the same subject matter and a memo has been preferred by the assessee- appellant stating categorically that he is not pressing certain questions of law and permission has been sought