BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

157 results for “depreciation”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,477Delhi1,962Chennai1,047Bangalore905Kolkata488Ahmedabad310Jaipur209Karnataka157Pune156Hyderabad146Raipur120Chandigarh99Lucknow68Indore58Cochin54Visakhapatnam50Surat35SC35Amritsar27Telangana25Jodhpur22Rajkot18Nagpur17Guwahati13Cuttack12Ranchi10Calcutta10Kerala6Patna6Varanasi5Rajasthan5Orissa3Panaji3Dehradun2Gauhati2Agra1Jabalpur1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Allahabad1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 260145Depreciation65Section 260A54Exemption49Charitable Trust42Section 1141Deduction41Section 3234Carry Forward of Losses25Section 143(3)

THE COMMISSIONER vs. JYOTHY CHARITABLE TRUST

ITA/707/2015HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 14Section 15Section 260Section 32

depreciation on assets put into use during the accounting year relevant to this assessment year, even though the entire cost of these assets have been claimed by the assessee as an application of income for charitable activities and same is exempt

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KRUPANIDHI EDUCATION

ITA/306/2015HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11

Showing 1–20 of 157 · Page 1 of 8

...
22
Set Off of Losses22
Addition to Income20
Section 260
Section 28
Section 32
Section 35(2)(iv)

depreciation has nothing to do with the application of income is not Date of Judgment 14-08-2018 I.T.A.No.306/2015 The Director of Income Tax (Exemption

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S YENEPOYA UNIVERSITY

ITA/549/2017HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 260Section 32

Exemptions) & another Vs. M/s Yenepoya University 4/22 3. This Court in case of ‘Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona’ [2018] 89 taxmann.com 127 [SC] with regard to allowability and Depreciation

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. ANJUMAN-E-ISLAM

ITA/428/2018HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 15Section 260Section 32Section 70

Depreciation in the hands of Religious and Charitable Trust held as under: “5. Learned Counsel at the Bar submitted that so far as the issue regarding claim of Date of Judgment 14 -08-2018 I.T.A.No.428/2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions

COMMISSIONER OF vs. MOOKAMBIKA TEMPLE

ITA/170/2016HC Karnataka30 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11(2)Section 14Section 15Section 260

depreciation on capital assets when it amounts to double deduction as the income of the assessee is already exempt and amended

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI SRI ADICHUNCHUNAGIRI SHIKSHANA TRUST

In the result, all the appeals are

ITA/384/2016HC Karnataka28 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 12ASection 144Section 260Section 263

depreciation on capital assets when it amounts to double deduction as the income of the assessee is already exempt and amended

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION

ITA/317/2014HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 32Section 35

Exemptions) & Another Vs. M/s International Institute of Information Technology 3/22 “1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessee would be entitled to claim depreciation

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. SHUSHRUTHA EDUCATIONAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/862/2017HC Karnataka21 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260

depreciation on new assets put into use during the accounting year relevant to this asst. year, even though the entire cost of these assets Date of Order 21-08-2018 I.T.A.No.862/2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI ADICHUNCHUNGIRI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/233/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

exemption under Section 10(23) of the Act. The addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA REDDY JANASANGHA

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/56/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

exemption under Section 10(23) of the Act. The addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS vs. AL-AMEEN CHARITABLE FUND TRUST

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/62/2010HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

exemption under Section 10(23) of the Act. The addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/431/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

exemption under Section 10(23) of the Act. The addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/414/2010HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

exemption under Section 10(23) of the Act. The addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION (MEDICAL)

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/430/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

exemption under Section 10(23) of the Act. The addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. SRI ADICHUNCHANAGIRI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/1/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

exemption under Section 10(23) of the Act. The addition of income was made on account of disallowance of depreciation

COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S RASTHROTHANA

ITA/168/2016HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 14Section 15Section 260Section 32

Exemptions) & another Vs. M/s Rasthrothana Parishat 4/22 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that assessee is entitled to claim depreciation

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SMT KAMALA

ITA/880/2017HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260Section 268ASection 32

Exemptions) & another Vs. Smt.Kamala and Sri.Venkappa M Agadi 3/21 “1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal were justified in law in allowing assessee’s claim for depreciation

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION

ITA/92/2016HC Karnataka14 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 14Section 15Section 260Section 32

Exemptions) & Another Vs. M/s Manipal Academy of Higher Education 4/22 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that assessee is entitled to claim depreciation

M/S. HORTICONTRACTS vs. M/S. AGRIHORTICULTURAL CONSULTANTS

RFA/92/2016HC Karnataka15 Feb 2017

Bench: K.S.MUDAGAL,H.P.SANDESH

Section 14Section 15Section 260Section 32

Exemptions) & Another Vs. M/s Manipal Academy of Higher Education 4/22 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that assessee is entitled to claim depreciation

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MANIPAL HOTEL & RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT

ITA/166/2016HC Karnataka30 Aug 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 12ASection 260Section 32

Exemptions) & Anr. Vs. Manipal Hotel & Restaurant Management College Trust. 3/12 2. The suggested substantial questions of law in the memo of appeal of Revenue are quoted below for ready reference:- 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal is right in law in allowing depreciation