PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

THE PR. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. GMR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) vs. M/S. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PVT. LTD.,

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

PR COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S GMR HYDERABAD

Appeals stand disposed of accordingly

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

undisclosed income or property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment." - 48 - 21. The Judgment of Meeta Gutgutia, supra was challenged before the Hon'ble Apex Court by the Revenue and Special Leave Petition has been dismissed condoning the delay

SRI S V SRINIVASA BABU vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

The appeal is disposed of

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND

undisclosed income of Rs.40,00,000/-. However, the Assessee has not paid the tax on the admitted income. 11. The appeal filed before the CIT(A) was rejected on the ground of delay and laches. When the matter was further appealed before the Tribunal, the maintainability of the appeal before the CIT(A) and compliance with Section

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SHRI RAMESH RAMACHANDRA RAO,

Bench: S.G.PANDIT,K. V. ARAVIND

condonation of delay, submits that the order passed by the Tribunal is founded on the judgment of this Court in IBC Knowledge Park Pvt. Ltd. (supra), which has attained finality. Learned counsel further submits that the additions made in the assessment order passed under Section 153C of the IT Act, to a concluded assessment are not based on any material

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S POLYFLEX (INDIA) PVT LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.340/2010 Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S OPTO CIRCUITS (INDIA) PVT LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.177/2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Opto Circuits (India) Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S POLYFLEX (INDIA) PVT LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.347/2010 Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S LUWA INDIA PVT LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.71/2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Luwa India Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GANGAGEN BIOTECHNOLOGIES P LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.783/2009 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Gangagen Biotechnologies P. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MONUMENTAL MEMORIALS

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.2927/2005 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Monumental Memorials 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ICE NETWORK (P) LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.462/2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS) & Anr. vs. M/s.Ice Network (P) Ltd., 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI M JAGADEESH KUMAR

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.106/2010 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. Sri M.Jagadeesh Kumar 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under