BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

124 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 91clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai370Chennai319Delhi226Kolkata198Bangalore180Ahmedabad143Karnataka124Hyderabad104Chandigarh94Jaipur89Nagpur87Pune69Indore50Surat44Raipur37Calcutta37Visakhapatnam31Patna29Cochin25Lucknow23Rajkot22Kerala17Cuttack17Guwahati15SC9Amritsar9Agra8Allahabad8Telangana6Rajasthan5Jodhpur5Panaji4Jabalpur4Varanasi4Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 234E84TDS21Section 2603Section 260A2Section 10A2Section 342Addition to Income2

M/S M.B. PATIL CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANR

WP/223253/2020HC Karnataka15 Jul 2022

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice S.Vishwajith Shetty W.P.No.223253/2020 (Gm-Res) C/W W.P.No.223254/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223255/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223256/2020 (Gm-Res) Between: M/S. M.B.Patil Constructions Ltd., Having Corporate Office At 2Nd Floor, Commercial Building No.1, Opp. Income Tax Building, Shankarsheth Road, Swaragate, Pune - 411 042, Maharashtra State. Rep. By Sri M.S.Mallikarjuna By His Gpa Holder, Sri Dhanaji Venkatrao Patil, Aged About 43 Years, Occ: Business, R/O Plot No.10, Konark Aditya Block, Golibar Maidan Chowk, Camp Pune - 411 001. …Petitioner

Section 34Section 34(3)Section 5

91 days or 92 days or 89 days. Re : Question (iii) 19. As the award was received by the Executive Engineer on 12.11.2007, for the purpose of calculating the three months period, the said date shall have to be excluded having regard to Section 12(1) of Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 9 of General Clauses Act, 1897. Consequently

CENTRAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE vs. UNION OF INDIA

Showing 1–20 of 124 · Page 1 of 7

WP/15476/2014
HC Karnataka
12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

DR V. NARAYANASWAMY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/10243/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S PROCESS PUMPS (I) PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14296/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S TEE ENN ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/19762/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/18788/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14669/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/41614/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53286/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/13065/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/38127/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S. K K BROTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/3725/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/11889/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/16939/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S HOTEL FISHLAND vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12097/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/26589/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

MINTENT SERVICED APARTMENTS PVT LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/25841/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/23541/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section

ADITHYA BIZORP SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/6918/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

91 Section 200 or the proviso to sub- section (3) of Section 206C. He shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum [of one hundred rupees] for every day during which the failure continues: Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases.- 273B. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of (clause (b) of sub-section (1) of) (Section 271, Section