KERADI MILK PRODUCERS WOMEN S vs. PRL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

79 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. New Co-Operative Society. Turn over is less than one crore. Not aware of the new provision. WP No.29583/2019 Sasthavu Halu Utpadakara Sahakara Sangha Annexure “A” condonation of delay application. Delay is 63 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. Turn over is less than one crore

PADUMUNDU MILK PRODUCERS WOMEN vs. PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

79 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. New Co-Operative Society. Turn over is less than one crore. Not aware of the new provision. WP No.29583/2019 Sasthavu Halu Utpadakara Sahakara Sangha Annexure “A” condonation of delay application. Delay is 63 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. Turn over is less than one crore

SASTHAVU HALU UTHPADAKARA MAHILA vs. PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

79 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. New Co-Operative Society. Turn over is less than one crore. Not aware of the new provision. WP No.29583/2019 Sasthavu Halu Utpadakara Sahakara Sangha Annexure “A” condonation of delay application. Delay is 63 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. Turn over is less than one crore

NAVANIDHI VIVIDHODDESHA vs. PRL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

79 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. New Co-Operative Society. Turn over is less than one crore. Not aware of the new provision. WP No.29583/2019 Sasthavu Halu Utpadakara Sahakara Sangha Annexure “A” condonation of delay application. Delay is 63 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. Turn over is less than one crore

K M CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD vs. PRL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

79 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. New Co-Operative Society. Turn over is less than one crore. Not aware of the new provision. WP No.29583/2019 Sasthavu Halu Utpadakara Sahakara Sangha Annexure “A” condonation of delay application. Delay is 63 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. Turn over is less than one crore

BALKURU HALU UTHPADAKARA vs. PRL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

79 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. New Co-Operative Society. Turn over is less than one crore. Not aware of the new provision. WP No.29583/2019 Sasthavu Halu Utpadakara Sahakara Sangha Annexure “A” condonation of delay application. Delay is 63 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. Turn over is less than one crore

THOMBATHU MILK PRODUCERS vs. PRL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

79 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. New Co-Operative Society. Turn over is less than one crore. Not aware of the new provision. WP No.29583/2019 Sasthavu Halu Utpadakara Sahakara Sangha Annexure “A” condonation of delay application. Delay is 63 days in filing Return. Situated in a small village. Turn over is less than one crore

SMT. P.UMA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. M. Shyam Prasad Writ Petition No.7294/2020 (Lr) Between : Smt. P.Uma W/O Siddappa Aged About 58 Years, Working As Tailor No.938, 7Th Cross J T Road, Raghavendra Blcok Srinagar, Bengaluru - 560 050. ... Petitioner (By Sri. M. Keshavareddhy., Advocate) & : 1. The Assistant Commissioner Ramanagara Sub Division Ramangara District - 562 159. 2. The Tahashildar Ramangara Tq Ramanagara District - 562 159. 3. R. Ronald Sebastian S/O Y K Rajanna Aged About 55 Years, R/O No.D-10 Ground Floor

79): 74/2009 along with an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation stating that 7 the delay

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S I G PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED

The appeals are disposed of and the application for

Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD,T.M.NADAF

SECTION 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, IN MP.NO.47/BANG/2022) IN ITA NO.1317/BANG/2018) DATED 30.05.2024 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006/2007 ANNEXURE A AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL

M/S HUBLI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

In the result, the appeals are disposed of as

Bench: JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA,S.SUJATHA

condonation of delay, without considering the principles enunciated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court? : 5 : ii) Whether the order of the Tribunal can be held to be good in law, when it dismissed the appeal of the appellant solely on the ground of limitation without examining the merits of the appeal especially against the background that the subject-amounts involved

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue

DR V. NARAYANASWAMY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

79 so deducted against his tax liability and same can be taken note off by the jurisdictional assessing Officer of deductee only on the information that would be furnished by the deductor to the Department. It is contended that the significance of TDS lies in the fact that it prepones the collection of tax to ensure regular source of revenue