WEIR BDK VALVES vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
WP/72328/2012HC Karnataka05 Jun 2015
Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice B.Manohar W.P. No.72328 & W.P.Nos.72395-397/2012(T-Res) Between: Weir Bdk Valves, A Unit Of Weir India Private Limited., (Formserly B.D.K. Engineering Industries Limited) No.47/48, Gokul Road, Hubli – 580 030, Represented Herein By Its Head – Finance & Accounts, Mr.Lokesh Bhatia. ... Petitioner (By Sri.T.Suryanarayana, Adv. For M/S.King & Partridge, Advs) And: 1. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (Audit – 1) , D.C. Compound, Dharwad. 2. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (Audit), Kumta.
Section 14Section 29(1)Section 9(2)
Section 69 of the KVAT Act. In the said letter, the
petitioner has contended that, they are claiming refund of
Rs.3,56,15,297/-, hence the question of demanding tax from the
petitioner does not arise. The Inter-State transaction is covered by the
statutory forms i.e. ‘C’ Forms and ‘H’ Forms and the petitioner is
entitled for concessional rate
