SMT. DR. SUDHA KRISHNASWAMY vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

50 YEARS R/AT No.385, TROY DEL WAY WILLIAMSVILLE, NEW YORK 14221 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. ... PETITIONER [BY SRI BALRAM R. RAO, ADV.] AND: 1. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTL. TAXN), SOUTH ZONE, BANGALORE CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD BANGALORE-560001, KARNATAKA. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTL. TAXN), SOUTH ZONE BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, 6TH FLOOR R.P. BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA

M/S SUMAN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5

Bench: The Hon’Ble Dr Justice Vineet Kothari

Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking condonation of delay in payment of 3rd Instalment of the tax amount declared by the petitioner assessee under the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 (IDS 2016). 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner assessee submitted before the Court that though the first and second instalments were paid within the stipulated

SRI. M SEETHAPATHY RAO vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

50,000/- being 7.5% of the tax demand through State Bank of India. Thereafter appeal came to be filed on 31.8.2017 after 10 consultancy. The delay was due to the aforesaid reasons and not intentional. The said aspect has not been considered by the 2nd respondent – appellate authority. The appellate authority proceeded to dismiss the appeal on the ground that

M/S. THE KOLAR & CHICKBALLAPUR vs. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER

The appeal stands disposed of as indicated above

Bench: S.SUJATHA,RAVI V HOSMANI

delay of one day in filing the return ought to have been condoned and no powers under Section 154 of the Act would have been invoked. Referring to the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of T.S. Balaram, - 7 - ITO vs. Volkart Brothers reported in (1971) 82 ITR 50

SARVODAYA EDUCATION TRUST vs. THE UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri

50 to challenge the impugned orders passed by the Controlling Authority by way of appeal invoking Section 7(7) of the said Act. It shall be open to the petitioners to seek the exclusion of time bona fide spent on these writ proceedings invoking Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The proviso to Section 7(7) of the said

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

M/S. K K BROTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

DR V. NARAYANASWAMY vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

MINTENT SERVICED APARTMENTS PVT LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

50 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI-110 001. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 4TH FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE