BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

145 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 41clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai662Delhi657Mumbai595Kolkata346Bangalore219Ahmedabad211Hyderabad175Karnataka145Jaipur130Pune125Chandigarh120Surat85Amritsar84Raipur84Nagpur80Indore65Cuttack62Lucknow61Calcutta43Rajkot35Visakhapatnam31Panaji31Cochin28SC26Guwahati24Telangana14Patna13Varanasi12Allahabad10Dehradun9Agra8Jabalpur6Jodhpur5Orissa5Rajasthan5Punjab & Haryana1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 234E84Section 26034TDS21Section 12A16Section 276C7Exemption5Revision u/s 2635Section 10(20)4Section 143

M/S M.B. PATIL CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANR

WP/223253/2020HC Karnataka15 Jul 2022

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice S.Vishwajith Shetty W.P.No.223253/2020 (Gm-Res) C/W W.P.No.223254/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223255/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223256/2020 (Gm-Res) Between: M/S. M.B.Patil Constructions Ltd., Having Corporate Office At 2Nd Floor, Commercial Building No.1, Opp. Income Tax Building, Shankarsheth Road, Swaragate, Pune - 411 042, Maharashtra State. Rep. By Sri M.S.Mallikarjuna By His Gpa Holder, Sri Dhanaji Venkatrao Patil, Aged About 43 Years, Occ: Business, R/O Plot No.10, Konark Aditya Block, Golibar Maidan Chowk, Camp Pune - 411 001. …Petitioner

Section 34Section 34(3)Section 5

condone the delay beyond thirty days having regard to the word used in the proviso to Section 34(3) of the Act, ‘but not thereafter’. (c) If a request is made under Section 33 of the Act, 1996 before the Tribunal, then the limitation under Section 34(3) for filing an application under Section 34 would commence from the date

KAMALSAB S/O. DAWOODSAB SAVANUR vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Showing 1–20 of 145 · Page 1 of 8

...
4
Section 2644
Section 3784
Addition to Income3
WP/79811/2013
HC Karnataka
13 Feb 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar Writ Petition No. 79811 Of 2013(Lr) Between Sri. Kamalsab S/O. Dawoodsab Savanur Age: 51 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/O. Kotigeri Oni, Hangal, Dist:Haveri. ... Petitioner (By Sri. D L Ladkhan, Advocate) & 1. The State Of Karnataka R/By Secretary Department Of Revenue M.S. Building, Bengaluru 2. The Land Tribunal, Hangal R/By Its Secretary Tq:Hangal, Dist: Haveri 3. Sri. Ramachandra Hemajippa Sugandhi Since Deceased By His Lrs 3A. Smt. Sunanda W/O. Krishna Sugandhi Age: Major, Occ: Household Work R/O. Bazar Galli, Near Chavadi Hangal, Dist: Haveri

condoned. In other words, where circumstances justifying the conduct exist, the illegality which is manifest, cannot be sustained on the sole ground of laches. When substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred, for the other side cannot claim to have a vested right in the injustice being done

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S SHARAVATHY CONDUCTORS (P) LTD.,

WA/18021/2011HC Karnataka27 Aug 2013

Bench: B.MANOHAR,DILIP B.BHOSALE

Section 143(1)(a)Section 264Section 4Section 80HSection 80I

41 years, No. 23, BCI Estate, 6th Main, Old Madras Road, Bangalore-560 016. …RESPONDENT (By Sri. Ganesh H. Kempanna, Advocate) 2 This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order dated 7.3.2011 passed in Writ Petition No. 32772/2009. This Writ Appeal coming on for Orders this

THE CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES vs. MR. GOPAL S HEBBALLI

Appeals are dismissed as not

WA/100127/2022HC Karnataka28 Mar 2022

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice K. Natarajan Criminal Appeal No.100124/2022 C/W Criminal Appeal Nos. 100123/2022, 100125/2022, 100126/2022, 100127/2022, 100130/2022, 100131/2022, 100132/2022, 100133/2022, 100134/2022, 100135/2022, 100136/2022, 100137/2022, 100138/2022, 100139/2022, 100140/2022, 100141/2022, 100142/2022, 100143/2022, 100144/2022, 100145/2022, 100172/2022, 100173/2022, 100026/2022, 100077/2022, 100078/2022, 100079/2022, 100080/2022, 100081/2022, 100082/2022, 100083/2022, 100084/2022, 100085/2022, 100086/2022, 100090/2022, 100091/2022, 100092/2022, 100093/2022, 100094/2022, 100095/2022, 100114/2022

Section 276CSection 378

41 THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R These appeals are filed by the Income Tax Department under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’ for brevity) challenging the order passed by the learned Magistrate, JMFC

SARVODAYA EDUCATION TRUST vs. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/39434/2013HC Karnataka03 Aug 2017

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri

Section 1Section 2(1)

41 the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that legislature has the power to amend, delete or obliterate the statute or to enact a statute prospectively or retrospectively. 44. In the case of UNION v. MADAN GOPAL KABRA reported in 1954 SCR 541, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the Parliament has the power to impose retrospectively

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/44116/2014HC Karnataka06 Jun 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 143

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/44118/2014HC Karnataka06 Jun 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 143

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/44120/2014HC Karnataka06 Jun 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 143

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WP/44117/2014HC Karnataka06 Jun 2018

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

Section 10(20)Section 12ASection 143

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/23541/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/11889/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53286/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/13065/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/18788/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14669/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/38127/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/26589/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/41614/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/16939/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

41 YEARS. 8. CRAIGMORE TEXTILES PVT. LTD. NH4, TAVAREKERE ROAD, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE-562123 BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.S.RAMACHANDRA, S/O SHIVANDAS L.THANVANI, AGED 75 YEARS, .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S R SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE, SRI.CHAITANYA V.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI NEW DELHI-100 010. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES