THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AMD INDIA PVT. LTD.,

Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1 of 2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants - Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has Date of order: 24-7-2018 I.T.A. No.627/2017 The Pr. Commissioner

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 vs. M/S I2 TECHNOLOGIES

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed/withdrawn without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1 of 2017 is allowed accordingly. Date of order: 01-08-2018 ITA No.1003/2017 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- 4 & Anr. Vs. M/s. i2 Technologies Software Pvt. Ltd. 3/14 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants - Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs. M/S TANGLIN

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed/withdrawn without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Date of order: 01-08-2018 ITA No.446/2018 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-(Central) & Anr. Vs. M/s. Tanglin Developments Ltd. 3/15 I.A. No.1 of 2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants - Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ASPECT TECHNOLOGY CENTRE INDIA PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1 of 2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Date of order: 24-7-2018 I.T.A. No.973/2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax and another v. M/s. Aspect Technology

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 7 vs. M/S UEI ELECTRONICS PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1 of 2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants - Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has Date of order: 24-7-2018 I.T.A. No.614/2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI SATISH CHANDRA

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Liberty

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MONUMENTAL MEMORIALS

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Date

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. DR RAVIVARMA ALVA

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Liberty

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(3) vs. SRI VIJENDRA ALVA M

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Liberty

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S UNITED RACING & BLOODSTOCK,

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Liberty

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S POLYFLEX (INDIA) PVT LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Date

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GEMINI DISTILLERIES

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ICE NETWORK (P) LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Date

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR BOHRA

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI M JAGADEESH KUMAR

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Date

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI ANIL KABRA

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Date

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI K GOPAL

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Date

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GANGAGEN BIOTECHNOLOGIES P LTD

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

268A – Instruction No.3 of 2011, dated 9-2-2011. The view adopted by the Delhi High Court making the circular applicable to pending matters came up before a three- Judges Bench of this Court in SLP (C) No.CC 13694 of 2011 titled CIT v. Surya Herbal Ltd. when the following order was passed on August 29, 2011: “Delay condoned. Date