BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

139 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 253(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai332Indore239Delhi223Chennai222Kolkata170Karnataka139Ahmedabad134Jaipur125Bangalore115Surat113Lucknow108Chandigarh99Pune64Raipur47Hyderabad44Panaji43Nagpur42Cuttack38Rajkot36Allahabad32Patna28Cochin26Jabalpur22Varanasi20Visakhapatnam14Guwahati14Ranchi9Jodhpur8Amritsar8Agra8SC4Telangana2Rajasthan1Dehradun1Calcutta1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 260A57Revision u/s 26316Penalty10Addition to Income10Section 2605

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S UNITED RACING & BLOODSTOCK,

ITA/388/2010HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(3) vs. SRI VIJENDRA ALVA M

ITA/1094/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

Showing 1–20 of 139 · Page 1 of 7

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. DR RAVIVARMA ALVA

ITA/546/2007HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI SATISH CHANDRA

ITA/548/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR BOHRA

ITA/990/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MOOLA TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

ITA/107/2005HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GEMINI DISTILLERIES

ITA/887/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S POLYFLEX (INDIA) PVT LTD

ITA/340/2010HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.340/2010 Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M S NAGAPPA

ITA/36/2005HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI K GOPAL

ITA/798/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.798/2006 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. Sri K.Gopal 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MONUMENTAL MEMORIALS

ITA/2927/2005HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.2927/2005 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Monumental Memorials 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI ANIL KABRA

ITA/168/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.168/2006 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. Sri Anil Kabra 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI M JAGADEESH KUMAR

ITA/106/2010HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.106/2010 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. Sri M.Jagadeesh Kumar 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI ANIL KABRA

ITA/166/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.166/2006 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. Sri Anil Kabra 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S POLYFLEX (INDIA) PVT LTD

ITA/347/2010HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.347/2010 Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI MADANLAL SOLANKI

ITA/897/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.897/2006 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. Sri Madanlal Solanki 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S LUWA INDIA PVT LTD

ITA/71/2007HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.71/2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Luwa India Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GANGAGEN BIOTECHNOLOGIES P LTD

ITA/783/2009HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.783/2009 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Gangagen Biotechnologies P. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S LUWA INDIA PVT LTD

ITA/105/2007HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.105/2007 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Luwa India Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S OPTO CIRCUITS (INDIA) PVT LTD

ITA/177/2006HC Karnataka30 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260A

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.177/2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Opto Circuits (India) Pvt. Ltd. 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases