THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S AMD INDIA PVT. LTD.,

Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1 of 2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants - Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has Date of order: 24-7-2018 I.T.A. No.627/2017 The Pr. Commissioner

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 7 vs. M/S UEI ELECTRONICS PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1 of 2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants - Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has Date of order: 24-7-2018 I.T.A. No.614/2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI P M A RAZAK

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed/withdrawn without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ST ANNS SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering the

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S FEATHERLITE

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2016 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Date of Order 18-07-2018 I.T.A.No.143/2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax and Anr. vs. M/s Featherlite Corporation. 3/12 Government

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ASPECT TECHNOLOGY CENTRE INDIA PVT LTD

Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1 of 2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Date of order: 24-7-2018 I.T.A. No.973/2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax and another v. M/s. Aspect Technology

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S MONUMENTAL MEMORIALS

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.2927/2005 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. M/s.Monumental Memorials 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. DR RAVIVARMA ALVA

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S UNITED RACING & BLOODSTOCK,

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income-tax Act, 1961 in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI M JAGADEESH KUMAR

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Delay condoned. Date of order: 30-7-2018 I.T.A. No.106/2010 The Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr. vs. Sri M.Jagadeesh Kumar 5/22 Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated February 9, 2011 should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under