THOMBATHU MILK PRODUCERS vs. PRL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the R-2 marked as Annexure – “B”. These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following: COMMON ORDER In the instant petitions, petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the respective

SASTHAVU HALU UTHPADAKARA MAHILA vs. PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the R-2 marked as Annexure – “B”. These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following: COMMON ORDER In the instant petitions, petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the respective

KERADI MILK PRODUCERS WOMEN S vs. PRL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the R-2 marked as Annexure – “B”. These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following: COMMON ORDER In the instant petitions, petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the respective

BALKURU HALU UTHPADAKARA vs. PRL COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the R-2 marked as Annexure – “B”. These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following: COMMON ORDER In the instant petitions, petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the respective

K M CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD vs. PRL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the R-2 marked as Annexure – “B”. These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following: COMMON ORDER In the instant petitions, petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the respective

PADUMUNDU MILK PRODUCERS WOMEN vs. PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the R-2 marked as Annexure – “B”. These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following: COMMON ORDER In the instant petitions, petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the respective

SHREE GURU NITHYANANDA SOUHARDA vs. PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the R-2 marked as Annexure – “B”. These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following: COMMON ORDER In the instant petitions, petitioners are seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing the respective

M/S M.B. PATIL CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANR

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice S.Vishwajith Shetty W.P.No.223253/2020 (Gm-Res) C/W W.P.No.223254/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223255/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223256/2020 (Gm-Res) Between: M/S. M.B.Patil Constructions Ltd., Having Corporate Office At 2Nd Floor, Commercial Building No.1, Opp. Income Tax Building, Shankarsheth Road, Swaragate, Pune - 411 042, Maharashtra State. Rep. By Sri M.S.Mallikarjuna By His Gpa Holder, Sri Dhanaji Venkatrao Patil, Aged About 43 Years, Occ: Business, R/O Plot No.10, Konark Aditya Block, Golibar Maidan Chowk, Camp Pune - 411 001. …Petitioner

227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 30.01.2020 passed on IA-2 in Commercial Arbitration Suit No.5/2019 on the file of the Prl. District & Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, at Annexure-G. 3 These petitions having been heard and reserved for orders on 28.06.2022, coming on for 'Pronouncement of orders', this day, the Court made the following

DR(SMT) SUJATHA RAMESH vs. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

Bench: The Hon'Ble Dr.Justice Vineet Kothari

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT, VIDE ANNEX-A AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONDONE THE DELAY AND GRANT THE BENEFIT OF THE DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION

SRI. DEVENDRA PAI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav Writ Petition No. 52305/2018 (T-It) Between: Sri. Devendra Pai S/O. Late Narasimha Pai No. 1012, "Udaya", 2Nd Cross, Vivekananda Circle, Mysore - 23. … Petitioner (By Sri. S. Shankar, Senior Advocate As Amicus Curiae Sri. S. Parthasarathi, Advocate) And: 1. The Assistant Commissioner Of

227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order passed by respondent No.2 dated 17.02.2017 vide Annexure-G and direct respondent No.2 to consider the application filed by petitioner under Section 264 of the Act and condone the delay

M/S N.M.D.C vs. THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING

Bench: R-1.

delay not beyond 60 days, it would come within the ambit and sweep of the provisions and policy of legislation. It is equivalent to Section 3 of the Limitation Act. Therefore, it is uncondonable and it cannot be condoned taking recourse to Article 142 of the Constitution.” 19 14. In the case of Asstt. Commr. (CT), LTU, Kakinada v. Glaxo

M/S SHARAVATHY CONDUCTORS vs. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF

Bench: The Hon’Ble Dr.Justice Vineet Kothari W.P.No.28376/2017 (T-It) Between

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 DTD:5.7.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-A & ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Mr. S. Annamalai, & Sri. M. Lava, Advs. for Mr. Shankar A, Adv., Petitioner. The petitioner-assessee, aggrieved by the impugned order passed

ARECANUT PROCESSING AND SALE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, these petitions are allowed

Bench: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ram Mohan Reddy

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DAVANAGERE DATED 10TH JANUARY 2012 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DAVANAGERE TO CONDONE THE DELAY AND TO THE 2 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD II SHIMOGA TO PROCESS THE RETURN FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS

ERAPPA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr Justice M.G.S. Kamal Writ Petition No. 9257 Of 2014 (Sc/St) Between:

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKMAGALORE, DATED.07.02.89 VIDE ANNEXURE-C & PLEASE TO CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER TARIKERE, DATED:28.10.88. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Present petition is filed by the petitioner

KAMALSAB S/O. DAWOODSAB SAVANUR vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar Writ Petition No. 79811 Of 2013(Lr) Between Sri. Kamalsab S/O. Dawoodsab Savanur Age: 51 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/O. Kotigeri Oni, Hangal, Dist:Haveri. ... Petitioner (By Sri. D L Ladkhan, Advocate) & 1. The State Of Karnataka R/By Secretary Department Of Revenue M.S. Building, Bengaluru 2. The Land Tribunal, Hangal R/By Its Secretary Tq:Hangal, Dist: Haveri 3. Sri. Ramachandra Hemajippa Sugandhi Since Deceased By His Lrs 3A. Smt. Sunanda W/O. Krishna Sugandhi Age: Major, Occ: Household Work R/O. Bazar Galli, Near Chavadi Hangal, Dist: Haveri

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL, DATED:28/04/1988 AT ANNEXURE-B AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: : 3 : ORDER Heard Sri Ladkhan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Ravi V. Hosamani, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents

VASUDEV ADIGAS FAST FOODS PVT. LTD. vs. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

In the result, the petition is allowed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of certiorari for quashment of order dated 16.01.2018 passed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for short) and to 3 allow the application submitted by the petitioner dated

SRI NARAYANAN KOLLAKKIL KUTTY vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I pass the following:

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R1 DTD 31.05.2022 PASSED U/S 119(2)(b) OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-20 IN FILE F.NO.711/119(2)(b)/PCIT-1/BLR/2020-21 ANNEXURE-G AND ETC. 2 THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER In this petition, petitioner

SMT. DR. SUDHA KRISHNASWAMY vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 08.10.2015 PASSED UNDER SECTION 119(2)(b) OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 IN ANNEXURE-G AND ETC. THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- O R D E R Petitioner