BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

122 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 197(17)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka122Chennai71Mumbai69Chandigarh58Bangalore43Delhi42Jaipur26Kolkata22Surat22Lucknow10Varanasi5Cuttack4Ahmedabad3Hyderabad3Jodhpur2Pune2SC2Visakhapatnam2Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1Amritsar1Calcutta1Nagpur1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 234E84TDS21Section 342

M/S M.B. PATIL CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. vs. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANR

WP/223253/2020HC Karnataka15 Jul 2022

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice S.Vishwajith Shetty W.P.No.223253/2020 (Gm-Res) C/W W.P.No.223254/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223255/2020 (Gm-Res), W.P.No.223256/2020 (Gm-Res) Between: M/S. M.B.Patil Constructions Ltd., Having Corporate Office At 2Nd Floor, Commercial Building No.1, Opp. Income Tax Building, Shankarsheth Road, Swaragate, Pune - 411 042, Maharashtra State. Rep. By Sri M.S.Mallikarjuna By His Gpa Holder, Sri Dhanaji Venkatrao Patil, Aged About 43 Years, Occ: Business, R/O Plot No.10, Konark Aditya Block, Golibar Maidan Chowk, Camp Pune - 411 001. …Petitioner

Section 34Section 34(3)Section 5

condonable delay. The legislature had the choice of describing the periods of time in the same units, that is, to describe the periods as "three months" and "one month" respectively or by describing the periods as "ninety days" and "thirty days" respectively. It did not do so. Therefore, the legislature did not intend that the period of three months used

CENTRAL POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE vs. UNION OF INDIA

Showing 1–20 of 122 · Page 1 of 7

WP/15476/2014
HC Karnataka
12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

DR V. NARAYANASWAMY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/10243/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S HOTEL FISHLAND vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/12097/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/18788/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

ADITHYA BIZORP SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/6918/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

ECOLE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14669/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

SRI. FATHERAJ SINGHVI vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/41614/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S MAHRISHI MELTCHEMS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/53286/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S NEW MEDIA COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/13065/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

SREE C B EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/38127/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S. K K BROTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/3725/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S PRODIGY TECHNOVATIONS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/11889/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S TEACHERS CO OPERATIVE BANK vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/16939/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S TEE ENN ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/19762/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S. LAKSHMINIRMAN BANGALORE PVT.LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

WP/26589/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

MINTENT SERVICED APARTMENTS PVT LTD., vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/25841/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

SRI CHANDRAKAR K KAMATH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF

WP/23541/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing

M/S PROCESS PUMPS (I) PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA

WP/14296/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar

Section 234E

197 by the Assessing Officer of the payee; 95 (vi) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the compliance of provisions of sub-section (6) of Section 194C by the payee;] (vii) furnish particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the furnishing