M/S PRAKASH BUS CORPORATION PVT LTD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
WP/37689/2014HC Karnataka12 Jun 2015
Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr.Justice Aravind Kumar
Section 234E
17. The element of quid pro quo would not be
always a sine qua non for levy of fee. If there is broad
correlationship between the two it would suffice. The
Hon’ble Apex Court in MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF
DELHI & OTHERS VS. MOHD. YASIN reported in
(1983) 3 SCC 229 has held to the following effect:
“9.
What
