THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA STATE STUDENTS WELFARE FUND

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income tax Act has been amended to provide that in a case where a trust or institution has been granted registration under section 12AA - 10 - of the Income tax Act, the benefit

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/s KARNATAKA STATE STUDENTS WELFARE FUND

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income tax Act has been amended to provide that in a case where a trust or institution has been granted registration under section 12AA - 10 - of the Income tax Act, the benefit

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA STATE STUDENTS WELFARE FUND

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A of the Income tax Act has been amended to provide that in a case where a trust or institution has been granted registration under section 12AA - 10 - of the Income tax Act, the benefit

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal also taken note of the fact that the assessee was granted exemption under the provisions of Section 10(20) of the Act till 31.3.2003. Accordingly, the appeal came to be allowed. 12 13. It is also not in dispute

M/S SPPORTHI SADAN CONVENT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Accordingly, the appeal fails and stands dismissed

Bench: The Itat. The Said Appeal Was Presented With The Delay Of 997 Days. The Tribunal On

2. Heard Sri.S.Parthasarathi, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri. Y.V.Raviraj, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that, the appellant had filed an application under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for registration of trust. The said application had been rejected vide order dated 24/6/2011

M/S SEVA SADAN CONVENT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF

Accordingly, the appeal fails and stands dismissed

Bench: The Itat. The Said Appeal Was Presented With The Delay Of 997 Days. The Tribunal On

2. Heard Sri.S.Parthasarathi, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri. Y.V.Raviraj, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that, the appellant had filed an application under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for registration of trust. The said application had been rejected vide order dated 24/6/2011

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ST ANNS SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering the

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI P M A RAZAK

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed/withdrawn without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S FEATHERLITE

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2016 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Date of Order 18-07-2018 I.T.A.No.143/2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax and Anr. vs. M/s Featherlite Corporation. 3/12 Government

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits