THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA STATE STUDENTS WELFARE FUND

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/s KARNATAKA STATE STUDENTS WELFARE FUND

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA STATE STUDENTS WELFARE FUND

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: S.SUJATHA,HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

condonation of delay in seeking registration was not available. 8.3 In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, section 12A

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal

M/S NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice B. Veerappa

condoned the delay and directed the Commissioner of Income Tax, Mangalore to grant registration under Section 12A w.e.f. 1.4.2003. The Tribunal

M/S SPPORTHI SADAN CONVENT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Accordingly, the appeal fails and stands dismissed

Bench: The Itat. The Said Appeal Was Presented With The Delay Of 997 Days. The Tribunal On

condonation of delay, the onus is on the Assessee to explain the reason for each and every day of the delay. Except submitting that the Assessee was not aware of the law, he could not explain the reason for the delay occurred in filing the appeal”. 4. After recording the aforementioned finding and adverting to the judgement in the case

M/S SEVA SADAN CONVENT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF

Accordingly, the appeal fails and stands dismissed

Bench: The Itat. The Said Appeal Was Presented With The Delay Of 997 Days. The Tribunal On

condonation of delay, the onus is on the Assessee to explain the reason for each and every day of the delay. Except submitting that the Assessee was not aware of the law, he could not explain the reason for the delay occurred in filing the appeal”. 4. After recording the aforementioned finding and adverting to the judgement in the case

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JAYANAGAR EDUCATION SOCIETY

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 12A of the Income Act, 1961, (for short, ‘the Act’) originally on 31-10-2001 and later, on 5-2-2002. The application was rejected by the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) by holding that there was no genuine Society in existence as of now 3 and the activities carried out in the name of the assessee are being

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ST ANNS SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering the

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI P M A RAZAK

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed/withdrawn without

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S FEATHERLITE

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2016 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Date of Order 18-07-2018 I.T.A.No.143/2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax and Anr. vs. M/s Featherlite Corporation. 3/12 Government

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.1/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BOSCH LTD

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts & Supreme Court & The Earlier Monetary Limits For The High Courts Is

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants-Revenue has brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits

THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn without answering

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A.2/2018 is allowed accordingly. 2. Both the learned counsels have brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, has recently issued a revised Circular No.3/2018, dated 11th July, 2018, revising the monetary limits for filing appeals