BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

114 results for “charitable trust”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai229Chennai158Delhi142Karnataka114Bangalore82Jaipur58Kolkata57Ahmedabad53Cochin32Hyderabad28Chandigarh22Pune16Calcutta16Indore14Visakhapatnam12Agra9Surat9Cuttack7Nagpur5SC5Kerala5Rajasthan3Dehradun2Lucknow2Telangana2Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh2Rajkot1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 26052Exemption10Addition to Income8Section 116Depreciation3Section 148A2Section 12A2Section 11(2)2Deduction2

COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX vs. OHIO UNIVERSITY CHRIST COLLEGE

ITA/312/2016HC Karnataka17 Jul 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 11Section 12ASection 260

term `applied’ has wider connotation. 6. Depending upon the normal accounting practices adopted by the assessee in ordinary course of business, if a provision for an Date of Judgment: 17.07.2018 in ITA Nos.312 & 313 of 2016 Commissioner of Income-tax & another vs. Ohio University Christ College 21/47 expenditure is made in a particular year and the amount in question

THE COMMISSIONER OF vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE

ITA/106/2016HC Karnataka27 Sept 2018

Bench: ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA (CJ),S.G.PANDIT

Showing 1–20 of 114 · Page 1 of 6

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 260

short) in ITA No.267/Trust/CIT(A) V/10-11 and ITA No.838/Trust/CIT(A) V/11-12, contending that under Section 11(1) of the Act, depreciation is allowable as application of income. Further relying upon the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014, it was contended in the appeals that sub- Section (6) was inserted to Section 11 of the Act, wherein from the assessment year

AZIM PREMJI TRUSTEE COMPANY PVT LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, I pass the following:-

WP/15910/2022HC Karnataka28 Oct 2022

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 148ASection 56(2)

charitable entity belonging to the Azim Premji Group, to 4 be held as a part of the corpus of Trust. This gift was contemporaneously disclosed to the stock exchanges and this information was also disseminated to the public at large. This gift was also specifically disclosed in the audited accounts of the petitioner for the year ending 31.03.2014. The face

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME vs. SRI ADICHUNCHANAGIRI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/1/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS vs. AL-AMEEN CHARITABLE FUND TRUST

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/62/2010HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI ADICHUNCHUNGIRI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/233/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/431/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KARNATAKA REDDY JANASANGHA

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/56/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION (MEDICAL)

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/430/2013HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/414/2010HC Karnataka22 Feb 2016

Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.PATIL

Section 260

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SRI SRI ADICHUNCHUNAGIRI SHIKSHANA TRUST

In the result, all the appeals are

ITA/384/2016HC Karnataka28 Jun 2016

Bench: JAYANT PATEL,B.SREENIVASE GOWDA

Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 12ASection 144Section 260Section 263

short) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. 2. Since, common question of law is raised in all these appeals, the matters are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment. 3. The assessees in all these appeals are the charitable institutions registered under Section 12AA

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY

ITA/467/2015HC Karnataka25 Sept 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260

gains from the said business of manufacture and sale of liquor by M/S. CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY was not assessable in its hands ? [iii] Whether the method of Accounting or entries made in the Books of Accounts by the Respondent Assessee or maintaining the Bank Accounts under the close control and supervision of DIAGEO INDIA PRIVATE Date of Judgment

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (4) vs. M/S CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY

ITA/172/2017HC Karnataka25 Sept 2018

Bench: S.SUJATHA,VINEET KOTHARI

Section 260

gains from the said business of manufacture and sale of liquor by M/S. CHAMUNDI WINERY AND DISTILLERY was not assessable in its hands ? [iii] Whether the method of Accounting or entries made in the Books of Accounts by the Respondent Assessee or maintaining the Bank Accounts under the close control and supervision of DIAGEO INDIA PRIVATE Date of Judgment

MASTER BALACHANDAR KRISHNAN vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8788/2020HC Karnataka29 Sept 2020

Bench: B.V.NAGARATHNA,RAVI V HOSMANI

gain admission to the institution on account of horizontal reservation for Karnataka students. That -: 25 :- petitioners reliance on AIIMS Students’ Union vs. AIIMS, [(2002) 1 SCC 428], (AIIMS Students’ Union) is misplaced and not applicable to the instant case, as AIIMS is an institution created by an Act of Parliament, while the respondent/Law School is a creation of the Karnataka

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S WIPRO LTD

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA/133/2007HC Karnataka23 Aug 2013

Bench: B.MANOHAR,DILIP B.BHOSALE

Section 260

terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 11. That takes us to consider question of law-A11, which is common in all these appeals. The AO disallowed the claim of respondent-assessee, treating a sum of `14,396/- for the assessment year 1986-87, `1,32,315/- for the assessment

MR C V MANJUNATHA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/235/2018HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

CHARITABLE TRUST, A PUBLIC TRUST , RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU-560098 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI JAYENDRAPURI SWAMI ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001 2 . THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER STORM WATER DRAIN BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA

RAMA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27625/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

CHARITABLE TRUST, A PUBLIC TRUST , RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU-560098 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI JAYENDRAPURI SWAMI ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001 2 . THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER STORM WATER DRAIN BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA

SRI. GURUPRASAD vs. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/8176/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

CHARITABLE TRUST, A PUBLIC TRUST , RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU-560098 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI JAYENDRAPURI SWAMI ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001 2 . THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER STORM WATER DRAIN BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA

P. D. PONNAPPA vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12975/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

CHARITABLE TRUST, A PUBLIC TRUST , RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU-560098 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI JAYENDRAPURI SWAMI ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001 2 . THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER STORM WATER DRAIN BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA

RAJAPPA vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/50955/2019HC Karnataka19 Jan 2021

Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,B.A.PATIL

CHARITABLE TRUST, A PUBLIC TRUST , RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU-560098 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI JAYENDRAPURI SWAMI ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001 2 . THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER STORM WATER DRAIN BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA